| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vuttuc$up6h$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ezekiel Bazunov <eouaol@oalka.ru>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that Hafele-Keating 1971 experiment was
A HOAX.
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 19:33:32 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <vuttuc$up6h$1@dont-email.me>
References: <f77fb3c3315095aacf628a4ee545f0a1@www.novabbs.com>
<1rblpbq.cwqa4lh7vvo9N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:33:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="639246b354b8724321196d72ddac96bb";
logging-data="1008849"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18nFEDqqj8vBqTYejMF9rFw0bofWG+Qafc="
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/5EQXCkCDVzCtQnSPaDxKfjKXnU=
X-Face: $"eO7q^g,@mN0klG2J]sV"NMbeVMf2'-;P*@(~`UkK_cA{lP/ixtb>t!n{xTQK<7
PC})}3=9!ps)Wq/=wI'swo3![y6wN5"I`{Z7Jr`virT"6}OZN|Jn.q9`Drs(r8rOxq#ZCW'
,>|wg%J=BZ><Y<gC;4tucH~$4u9.x)k9Bt5Y*(fFz~1`]<3\F/V$AlnM6C9*EYL],~06R!0
hgSe6ua)>}cm>>9'v>&)\!06qQ]dy5b;&V8u0UdmE]g-AL{a$50'0Z\|:Q,:xMB0$U';.lO
C'e=%Lr/$6ZRDV<N@QX7QZfxK+*A$8rPS$lyNxb\b
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVbMhna3OCp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Bytes: 2731
J. J. Lodder wrote:
> And more FYI: An experiment isn't an experiment until it has been
> correctly interpreted,
incorrect, most experiments are brute force which works everytime.
Otherwise you may have that it works, but you dont know why. Or
conversely, not working inspite of everything is as prescribed.