Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vuu0e9$1102v$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Grand Apagon - Electricity (not) in Spain Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:16:08 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 68 Message-ID: <vuu0e9$1102v$1@dont-email.me> References: <vuqgef$1of93$1@dont-email.me> <vuqogf$1vlqj$1@dont-email.me> <vuqsdb$2497h$1@dont-email.me> <vusgmj$3lvur$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:16:10 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ed10dea6bd06a538dc7cada4c31dd25a"; logging-data="1081439"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX181pwNNAfv4sLcKH9ktDLvADJfdu/7uLI0=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:VVBhQIqI6VAzNm/fH6PX88nQpes= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vusgmj$3lvur$2@dont-email.me> Bytes: 4135 On 4/30/25 08:41, Bill Sloman wrote: > On 30/04/2025 1:48 am, Lasse Langwadt wrote: >> On 4/29/25 16:42, Bill Sloman wrote: >>> On 29/04/2025 10:24 pm, Martin Brown wrote: >>>> Spain suffered a very spectacular near total loss of its national >>>> grid yesterday taking parts of France and all of Portugal down with >>>> it. This is an unprecedented failure of a supergrid system by >>>> cascade failure. >>>> >>>> It seems likely they had got the effect of widespread solar PV has >>>> on load shedding wrong (much like happened in the UK) and so it >>>> failed completely. Two events a second apart delivered the coup de >>>> grace. >>>> >>>> They seem to have ruled out cyber attack and the electricity company >>>> is now trying to blame "the wrong sort of temperature variations"... >>>> >>>> Their 400kV lines seemed to be taking the blame with the national >>>> power company blaming exceedingly rare atmospheric phenomena due to >>>> "large" temperature differences in central Spain. They claimed that >>>> the magical sounding "induced atmospheric vibration" was to blame. >>>> >>>> https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/apr/28/spain-and-portugal-power-outage-cause-cyber-attack-electricity >>>> >>>> Another marginally plausible explanation given was that different >>>> impedances on cables at radically different temperatures on >>>> different paths messed up the phasing (but the numbers don't look >>>> right to me). >>>> >>>> Anyone have any idea what actually happened? >>>> >>>> The only one I am aware of that can take 400kV supergrid down is >>>> cables clashing together in older pylon configs where they are >>>> exactly one above the other and resonance effects allowing large >>>> amplitude standing waves to build up in the spans can occur in >>>> 70+mph winds. >>>> >>>> Most UK ones now have a longer central pylon spur so that the lines >>>> are more widely separated and up-down motion cannot allow them to >>>> touch. >>>> >>>> They do sing quite impressively in a gale though. The little weights >>>> at each end are apparently there to prevent such standing wave >>>> resonances damaging the pylon structure. Without them some pylons >>>> did fall down in the distant past during the most extreme of winter >>>> storms. >>> >>> The Guardian's science and technology reporting has never been great. >>> >>> The idea that renewable sources make the grid frequency harder to >>> manage sounds like total nonsense. >>> >> >> that depends, PV doesn't provide inertia like spinning turbines > > But grid scale batteries do - pumped hydro storage has the spinning > turbines, but grid scale batteries have invereters, which can reacta lot > faster than any spinning turbine, Photovoltaic power is variable so it > needs energy storage of some sort to smooth out the variations. production dropped 15GW in 5 seconds, all the grid batteries in Australia combined is about 1/5 of that ....