Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string
 transformations to inputs VERIFIED FACT
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 17:01:17 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vuu6je$151a8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vu6lnf$39fls$2@dont-email.me> <vuls34$1bf1j$4@dont-email.me>
 <vun87k$2m24h$2@dont-email.me> <vunb06$2fjjl$5@dont-email.me>
 <vuo57j$3h5l9$2@dont-email.me> <vuoath$3ljma$1@dont-email.me>
 <vuohgi$3td7u$1@dont-email.me> <vuonh6$2g74$2@dont-email.me>
 <vupeor$qf60$1@dont-email.me> <vupu0r$18vrc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vuqj5u$1rljg$1@dont-email.me> <vuql8e$1svmd$1@dont-email.me>
 <vur7vd$2dvvs$1@dont-email.me> <vur9t9$2gjif$1@dont-email.me>
 <vurasr$2hkih$1@dont-email.me> <vurbgd$2gjif$2@dont-email.me>
 <vurgt8$2n355$1@dont-email.me> <vuric8$2gjif$3@dont-email.me>
 <vutepm$gmbi$4@dont-email.me> <vutgjt$hkal$3@dont-email.me>
 <vutmka$nvbg$1@dont-email.me> <87ikmlzb3j.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 00:01:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="426e05277e8812ec523191f9693f8994";
	logging-data="1213768"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/iYIQoFSAqJXuD/R59bfsP"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:R9z4RKd7myZKnH5bRzpB8riYbH0=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250430-10, 4/30/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <87ikmlzb3j.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2954

On 4/30/2025 2:46 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> writes:
> [...]
>> Because you don't pay any attention at all
>> you did not bother to notice that I have never been
>> attacking the Halting Problem only the conventional
>> Halting Problem proof.
> [...]
> 
> That's some interesting news, at least to me.
> 
> I was under the impression that you had explicitly claimed to have
> solved the Halting Problem.  I don't read most of what you write,
> and I don't remember all of what I've read, so my impression may
> have been mistaken.
> 
> Now you're saying that you're only attacking the conventional proof.
> 

That is ALL that I have been saying for several years.
Anyone can figure that out simply on the basis of
actually paying attention to my proof.

HHH(DD) does correctly report that the halting problem
proof's impossible input DOES NOT HALT SO THE PROOF
IS WRONG.


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer