Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vuv144$1tuhu$5@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Grand Apagon - Electricity (not) in Spain
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 15:33:48 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <vuv144$1tuhu$5@dont-email.me>
References: <vuqgef$1of93$1@dont-email.me>
 <mqp11khbm5eoulgl4i7l1ncmm73irtnk5q@4ax.com>
 <6810ef6a$2$2786$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <qft11klssklbte9o8mu13o9m8jla77649r@4ax.com> <vusi3d$3lvur$5@dont-email.me>
 <vusuof$3ntuc$2@dont-email.me> <n7s41k1kh9fsnvegsc3g6can3u7hfflefh@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 07:33:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9d09fd72139f3c278638071aba0d8a0f";
	logging-data="2030142"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GxTszwyBp170P+JpxwKcVr8YkMKdbCvY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tIDyzW+slOLBzNfj4tWCM7k9FYM=
In-Reply-To: <n7s41k1kh9fsnvegsc3g6can3u7hfflefh@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250501-0, 1/5/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 2798

On 1/05/2025 4:51 am, john larkin wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:41:19 +0100, Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 30/04/2025 08:05, Bill Sloman wrote:
>>
>>> About 40% of new roof-top solar power installations in Australia include
>>> a Tesla Powerwall (or something similar) to keep the lights on at night.
>>>
>>> It adds appreciably to the capital cost, but pays for itself in a couple
>>> of years. Australia's feed-in tariffs aren't generous.
>>
>> Over here in the UK a 13.5kWh Tesla 3 powerwall will cost around £10k
>> (includes installation). This (USA) site suggests a payback time of 14
>> years
>> <https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/is-the-tesla-powerwall-the-best-solar-battery-available#is-the-tesla-powerwall-worth-the-price?>.
>>
>> This Australian site
>> <https://cleannrg.com.au/the-real-cost-of-teslas-powerwall-battery-storage/>
>> seems to suggest that a powerwall save A$3000 a year, but the initial
>> cost is A$20000. Doesn't that make the payback time 6 - 7 years rather
>> than just a couple?
> 
> Seems to me that utilities can store energy more efficiently than
> individuals can in their garage.
> 
> Same for solar panels.

Twaddle. The whole point about solar panel and lithium batteries is that 
they are modular. Aggregating a lot of them in one spot doesn't make 
them any more or less "efficient".

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney