Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Ratings Obliteration for Doctor Who
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 17:15:29 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <vv06n2$300v1$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vuufau$1b65l$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0p5abrt190kyq000@news.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 18:15:30 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="438d49d90eaedb4705fe1eccd67bcc5c";
	logging-data="3146721"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19nxUOEFYyCSn8RAYrFW+tcbLlP7jigYOI="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7Yk2mc3RiM18nJ4b68x2Pic96U0=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <xn0p5abrt190kyq000@news.eternal-september.org>
Bytes: 3736

On 01/05/2025 16:25, Blueshirt wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote:
> 
>> The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E02 have
>> come in including streaming, and it can now be said that Lux
>> is the lowest rating episode of all time ever since Doctor Who
>> began in 1963.
> 
> Two completely different stories from two completely different
> eras of the show, so a bit like comparing apples and oranges.
> 

This isn't comparing the episodes. It's comparing the ratings.

> I didn't think either episode was THAT bad actually, but they
> are episodes form eras of "Doctor Who" where the show is clearly
> on a downward trend among viewers.
> 

Actually Sylvester McCoy's era was on an upward trend. The writing 
started to improve and the stories got better. This is not the case for 
the incel pervert Ncuti Gatwa where the writing has descended into 
sexual harassment and debauchery because it's being written by a sick 
degenerate pervert that no man wants to sleep with.

>> The episode only added 1.42 million viewers over 7 days and
>> streaming to the dismal record breaking 1.58 viewers that
>> watched it overnight.
> 
> This stat alone shows why the overnights are no longer of any
> importance and the consolidated seven figure is more indicative.
> 
This stat shows that no one gives a fuck for the perverted crap Davies 
has replaced Doctor Who with in order to coerce and sexually groom children.

> Nearly as many people watched the episode over seven days
> streamed/time-shifted (1.42m) as they did on broadcast (1.58m).
No one but around 100,000 to 300,000 people watched the episode on 
broadcast. The rest were people who had their TV switched on an tuned 
into BBC1 all day no matter what it was showing.

The true 7 day ratings are not much better when you take into account 
that you only need to watch the episode online for just 10 seconds in 
order to count as a viewer, just as you do with YouTube. Divide 1.42 
million by 100 and you will get a far closer approximation to the number 
of people who watched the actual episode all the way through.

This pile of festering woke shit that sought to lecture the audience 
about AIDS, racism, and segregation, instead of telling an actual story 
about things the majority were interested in, couldn't have got more 
than about 500,000 people that watched 90% of it or more.

-- 
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it 
stands for." -William Shatner