Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vv259o$s2pu$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: aotto1968 <aotto1968@t-online.de> Newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: new TCL shell "atlsh" (reborn tcl8.5.19) Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 12:03:36 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <vv259o$s2pu$1@dont-email.me> References: <vual9c$32dut$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 12:03:36 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="790f294dc538d607c63a1f0c31f81dab"; logging-data="920382"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+wGvkuCPKP7vC9guUImWSRMWPFxBoshVg=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:akMHIbKP2EjWTpwqy9KaKj0G/lg= In-Reply-To: <vual9c$32dut$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1831 UPDATE [atlsh-1-2 c317774] strategy change from tcl8.5+PATCH to tcl8.6-PATCH 1019 files changed, 141526 insertions(+), 135312 deletions(-) During testing of tcl8.5 with the tcl8.6 test cases, it became apparent that there are numerous serious (core) bugs in tcl8.5 that were only patched in tcl8.6. However, tcl8.6 is now the problematic release with NRE and TCLOO. In a first attempt to patch tcl8.5, a large amount of code had to be imported from tcl8.6, which then raises the question of whether it even makes sense to patch tcl8.5 towards tcl8.6 if the end result is tcl8.6 anyway. The strategy of starting with tcl8.6 and removing everything that is unwanted seems to make more sense to me because it starts with a bug-free launch that is then successively retested at every step.