Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Megyn Kelly takes on George Clooney
Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 04:32:41 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vv29r4$vhsg$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vuenjq$265t8$9@dont-email.me> <vueqh7$1v5$1@reader1.panix.com>
 <vuerem$265t8$10@dont-email.me> <vugdlr$akfg$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 13:21:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cb30f5a275c58ae66e53ee66567a2c71";
	logging-data="1034128"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+IeuaDailAED90kgjSZNw9bHX/MyuX/jE="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s0+9Wh0D6zB0w1XqHZakajXgb48=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
Bytes: 2246

In article <vugdlr$akfg$1@dont-email.me>, nobody@nowhere.com wrote:
> On 4/24/2025 10:19 PM, Rhino wrote:
>> On 2025-04-24 10:03 PM, danny burstein wrote:
>>> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> writes:

>>>> It seems George Clooney has dissed Megyn Kelly during a discussion with
>>>> Patty Lupone so Megyn Kelly delivered a searing diatribe at him:
>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5L8jbRU5eE [12 minutes]
>>>
>>> Hey, anyone remember when Kegyn Melly was an objective
>>> and serious journalist?  What's that?  No one does???
>>>
>> Kelly apparently thinks she still is and cites many examples in support 
>> of that. Your mileage may vary.
>> 
>> In any case, she's still more credible as a journalist than Clooney is, 
>> which is her main point.
>
>Watched half of the clip.  She disses Clooney's dyed-black hair "at his 
>age", which seems oblivious to the fact that Clooney's been sporting 
>gray hair for eons, and is currently on Broadway as Edward R. Murrow. 
>But her big point is Clooney's failure to immediately excoriate Biden's 
>frailty, as if anyone anywhere has *ever* leapt to depose his party's 
>elected leader.  Oh, and a *real* journalist would've ignored George...

Ad hominems noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.