| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vv2aju$vhsg$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Uber messes up again Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 04:32:45 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: <vv2aju$vhsg$6@dont-email.me> References: <vuhft0$171dn$3@dont-email.me> <vuhik6$1gdki$2@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 13:34:23 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cb30f5a275c58ae66e53ee66567a2c71"; logging-data="1034128"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/9YLIQh9XdHLClOZiNoJ2ThXhy9r+X69w=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:o3Tc6Z8yfoEsixjFeN9BFLkV3Uk= X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit) Bytes: 1386 In article <vuhik6$1gdki$2@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote: > Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote: >>Uber charged a woman $789 for a trip of 0.03km (100 ft.) in a town she'd >>never been in. She fought the charge and Uber responded by blocking her >>use of the app. Surprisingly, the bank took steps to give her money back >>so she's not out-of-pocket. > >Waitaminit > >A bank isn't evil? Only if it isn't Bank of America. -- DON'T JUMP!