| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vv2qf8$1e24b$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Wisconsin Judge Arrested for Obstruction for Helping Illegal Alien Escape ICE Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 12:04:55 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 118 Message-ID: <vv2qf8$1e24b$2@dont-email.me> References: <vujb4b$2v233$3@dont-email.me> <vus5c0$3d1h5$1@dont-email.me> <vus6rp$3cpns$4@dont-email.me> <vutg3n$j462$1@dont-email.me> <vutpmm$r254$1@dont-email.me> <vutqlh$r88d$1@dont-email.me> <mfm61kdlq5pnc0fuqom631bo5d6aumq55d@4ax.com> <vv07jq$328im$4@dont-email.me> <ega91kl6v6ug28qk30i246kf8gtuvtfjh9@4ax.com> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 18:04:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3c7d9d561e7d16293b637d92edb13b42"; logging-data="1509515"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19JASgbGorMoa0zAy8xs8b8uG+d97K6s4Q=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:qsNI4VoofpxrxicROFqcqWckEV8= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <ega91kl6v6ug28qk30i246kf8gtuvtfjh9@4ax.com> Bytes: 6384 On 5/2/2025 7:20 AM, NoBody wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2025 12:30:49 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> > wrote: > >> On 5/1/2025 7:25 AM, NoBody wrote: >>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:37:37 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/30/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> On Apr 30, 2025 at 8:37:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/29/2025 11:53 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> On Apr 29, 2025 at 8:28:00 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 4/29/2025 11:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Apr 29, 2025 at 7:38:55 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 4/29/2025 10:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 29, 2025 at 1:32:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/29/2025 7:35 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:46:04 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2025 7:28 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actions always speak louder than words. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And both afford ample opportunity for (mis)interpretation. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing in her actions can be interpreted as anything other than >>>>>>>>>>>>> violating the law. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ...except for failing to honor a bogus warrant. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Except, as it turns out, it wasn't bogus. It was an administrative >>>>>>>>>>> warrant, >>>>>>>>>>> which is perfectly sufficient for arresting someone in a public place, >>>>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>> courthouse. The judge was insisting on a judicial warrant, but >>>>>>>>>>> that's only >>>>>>>>>>> necessary if making entry on private property to effect the arrest >>>>>>>>>>> against >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> consent of the owner. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So it turns out the judge was wrong, either because she's a state court >>>>>>>>>>> judge >>>>>>>>>>> and doesn't have knowledge and expertise on federal law, or, more >>>>>>>>>>> likely, >>>>>>>>>>> she >>>>>>>>>>> was just fucking around and delaying things to give the illegal time to >>>>>>>>>>> escape. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ironically, that increases the chance she made an honest mistake. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> An honest mistake wouldn't involve sticking her beak into things that are >>>>>>>>> none >>>>>>>>> of her business in the first place. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, this whole action was all about taking down a known "activist"... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it is about arresting a judge who broke the law by letting an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused criminal loose from her court. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. 'Accused' is different from 'convicted', you see... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Which has NOTHING to do with what I said. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What you said is that an *accused* criminal should be locked up. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, he didn't. He said an accused criminal should not be helped to >>>>>>>>>>> escape >>>>>>>>>>> law >>>>>>>>>>> enforcement by a judge who is sworn to uphold the law. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As he was merely accused, any "shoulds" are all in one's biases. I.e., >>>>>>>>>> he's entitled to the same "help" as an innocent you would be. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I wouldn't be entitled to a judge running cover for me while she >>>>>>>>> directs me >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> a back door to evade the cops, either. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *If* she thought you were illegally pursued, it'd be her *duty*. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, it wouldn't. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure it would, if not legally then ethically. >>>>> >>>>> Well, ethical civil disobedience comes with a price. MLK and Gandhi both >>>>> recognized that and did their time for breaking the law in pursuit of their >>>>> higher cause. This judge should be prepared to do the same. >>>> >>>> But if she believed the warrant invalid then, civil or uncivil, her >>>> disobedience would be inadvertent. >>> >>> She doesn't get to rule on the validity of the warrant. >>> >>> Duh.... >> >> She didn't issue a ruling. She ignored a supposedly invalid warrant. > > So...how did make the termination it was invalid if she didn't issue a > ruling? She consulted her knowledge of the law. We all think we have some. > You just made a case for her removal from the bench. She makes up her > own law. You make up your own conclusions.