Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Wisconsin Judge Arrested for Obstruction for Helping Illegal
 Alien Escape ICE
Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 14:01:42 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vv5lm7$2glq$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vujb4b$2v233$3@dont-email.me> <vv2qf8$1e24b$2@dont-email.me>
 <tc7c1k1faiqp2lmgq0i8j1i7l7qnbspoto@4ax.com> <vv5d76$3o7t6$2@dont-email.me>
 <vv5idb$3v9fm$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 03 May 2025 20:01:44 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="92b50b280d1dbb30020fd99067a4ebd2";
	logging-data="82618"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4jE1xjVjNcqmeJHPCPQ8iWNWsGICntbY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/ePaWOpUX14NwN2cdc8QNpQwnUo=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vv5idb$3v9fm$2@dont-email.me>

On 5/3/2025 1:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On May 3, 2025 at 8:37:09 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/3/2025 9:45 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>   On Fri, 2 May 2025 12:04:55 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>   wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 5/2/2025 7:20 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>   On Thu, 1 May 2025 12:30:49 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>   wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   She didn't issue a ruling. She ignored a supposedly invalid warrant.
>>>>>
>>>>>   So...how did make the termination it was invalid if she didn't issue a
>>>>>   ruling?
>>>>
>>>>   She consulted her knowledge of the law. We all think we have some.
>>>>
>>>   She had no authority to do so and inserted her personal opinion to
>>>   disregard law.
>>
>> We all have the "authority" to disregard an illegal order.
> 
> And we all have to pay the consequences when we do so and the order turns out
> to be legal after all, especially if we took other affirmative actions to
> frustrate the service of that order on a valid defendant.

Indeed, that's as may be.  But I assume her adjudicators will also take 
into account (among many other things) her actual state of mind.