Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Cap C-V test
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 02:11:47 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <vv6bc3$lohn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <sik71k9uvbqacp964bvlc5317ga12gu9al@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 May 2025 02:11:48 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8ccf9f3dae0c597a8245fd6abd4132cb";
	logging-data="713271"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Q6o5UAwI1FkdAs4IbCl5enK16Zqv/kf4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:P9NPUmNcOv1bbLz+13DPEADsJMI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <sik71k9uvbqacp964bvlc5317ga12gu9al@4ax.com>

On 5/1/25 22:09, john larkin wrote:
> 
> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/a7425c69k3w8wx8tqjpq5/X110_CV_Test.jpg?rlkey=pc3c0b12ncswv6ajrn148stdk&raw=1
> 
> 
> The DUT is a Venkel 2.2 uF 100v 1812-size ceramic cap. I need to run
> it at 48 volts. 0.8 uF is probably OK. I have room on my board so I
> guess I'll add another cap in parallel.

or in series, I believe there are some automotive standards that call 
for that on high current lines because ceramics tend to fail short with 
mechanical stress