Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: zen cycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: RE: Re: Disc's without power
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 07:29:41 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <vv7j36$3hugv$7@dont-email.me>
References: <9ePPP.1383463$f81.68811@fx48.iad>
 <m7adkuF521nU1@mid.individual.net> <pOtQP.3042132$t84d.1168427@fx11.iad>
 <m7f92cFspm0U1@mid.individual.net> <f_RQP.3$AMia.1@fx40.iad>
 <g2b81kttuidlkboilg6u87vs7prmgd2clh@4ax.com> <d27RP.9750$Ghwb.1046@fx10.iad>
 <vv3cto$1sjcp$3@dont-email.me> <hvmb1k53d7d3aq9i69568kfa0i5iufdm9p@4ax.com>
 <3lqRP.14727$7ja6.9606@fx45.iad> <16lc1kdkihr1hi1ld251nioi0g94oh8a9t@4ax.com>
 <T8uRP.14992$9zYa.2067@fx13.iad> <atrc1k5n1r353qfg7cr7v20d8bd78bas3p@4ax.com>
 <FnvRP.15727$f6Vd.4717@fx11.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 May 2025 13:29:43 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="810a5b2aa2306de6e3ec62c77524d7c4";
	logging-data="3734047"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19q1hzY86pLbecNEJlN9/dxEbi+Nn8/vcw="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lep4WkRWsnCEBi6J8TwEhNCjMIQ=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <FnvRP.15727$f6Vd.4717@fx11.iad>

On 5/3/2025 4:53 PM, cyclintom wrote:
> On Sat May 3 12:59:39 2025 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:
>>
>> Yet another lie and change of topic.  We were discussing whether your
>> have proven that you're an engineer.
>>
>> I'm not the only one who uses angle brackets to delimit URL's.  If
>> your "closure" theory were correct, you would be seeing your vague and
>> non-specific browser errors on every article that uses angle brackets.
>> That's not happening.
>>
>> You are also using two different news readers, the broken reader
>> provided by Newshosting and the buggy unfinished Windoze version of
>> Pan.  The newsreader names appear in the NNTP header of your postings.
>> I don't believe that both of your news reader programs can produce the
>> same error from only one person.
>>
>> If you must lie, at least make your lies believable (or maybe
>> entertaining).
>>
>>> In any case, whenever you cite a reference I will have to extract the actual address before attempting to read it. Though you shoud be equally careful to cite things that are actually pertinent to the conversation which you have not been doing.
>>
>> I see.  You want me to debate with you.  I don't thinks so.  It's
>> easier for me to just ignore your accusations.  Do whatever you find
>> amusing.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Liebermann, being an engineer is simple - you have to WORK and BE PAID as an engineer, You have not worked as an engineer. Tell us ONE DEVICE you designed or programmed?
> 
> You're so stupid that you can't even recognize an apology. The reason that you're such a failure is because you think that people are going to kiss your ass. Why they're just standing in line to do that. Haven't you noticed?
> 
> Tell me, when I said that there was a ">" appended to the address did it even occur to you for ONE second where the problem might be? 

I'm sure it occurred to all of us:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/PEBCAK

> Of course those references of your had NOTHING to so with the discussion anyway. But that is your typical manner. Wikipedia indeed!
> 
> In a couple of days I will be getting my envestment reports 

....right after he wrote "Of course those references of your had NOTHING 
to so with the discussion anyway. But that is your typical manner"

> and it will have gone up a little because the market as a whole has gone up a lot. This is in contradiction to the ECONOMY which has fallen somewhat because of the tariff complaints. 

lol...you mean that investment that was worth a million 5 years ago and 
is still worth a million?

> Did you every wonder why there were no complaints when Bill Clinton install LARGE tariffs to support American businesses? 

Clinton ordered tariffs? Name one. Clinton was famous for NAFTA, which 
_eliminated_ tariffs you fucking idiot.

> Trump only put in one for one.

lol...trump only put in for _one_ tariff?