Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Wisconsin Judge Arrested for Obstruction for Helping Illegal
 Alien Escape ICE
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 11:18:48 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <vv80go$289ah$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vujb4b$2v233$3@dont-email.me> <vv2qf8$1e24b$2@dont-email.me>
 <tc7c1k1faiqp2lmgq0i8j1i7l7qnbspoto@4ax.com> <vv5d76$3o7t6$2@dont-email.me>
 <vv5idb$3v9fm$2@dont-email.me> <vv5lm7$2glq$2@dont-email.me>
 <q11f1k54ikt81g05kl0eqft9rub6is1o16@4ax.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 May 2025 17:18:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="34dcbf6da8df8230db0e010a0c7e680e";
	logging-data="2368849"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+W2YOPOWnVqABUSBTG2RS3DXbQB8okMoc="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:48n417wRxUhUn4NP6CmHmUXWWjw=
In-Reply-To: <q11f1k54ikt81g05kl0eqft9rub6is1o16@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2742

On 5/4/2025 11:14 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Sat, 3 May 2025 14:01:42 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/3/2025 1:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On May 3, 2025 at 8:37:09 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/3/2025 9:45 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>    On Fri, 2 May 2025 12:04:55 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>    wrote:
>>>>>    
>>>>>>    On 5/2/2025 7:20 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>    On Thu, 1 May 2025 12:30:49 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>    wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    She didn't issue a ruling. She ignored a supposedly invalid warrant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    So...how did make the termination it was invalid if she didn't issue a
>>>>>>>    ruling?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    She consulted her knowledge of the law. We all think we have some.
>>>>>>
>>>>>    She had no authority to do so and inserted her personal opinion to
>>>>>    disregard law.
>>>>
>>>> We all have the "authority" to disregard an illegal order.
>>>
>>> And we all have to pay the consequences when we do so and the order turns out
>>> to be legal after all, especially if we took other affirmative actions to
>>> frustrate the service of that order on a valid defendant.
>>
>> Indeed, that's as may be.  But I assume her adjudicators will also take
>> into account (among many other things) her actual state of mind.
>>
> 
> Laughter.

Go with your strength...