Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vv99hg$3h92p$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Functions computed by Turing Machines MUST apply finite string transformations to inputs --- MT Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 22:58:56 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 59 Message-ID: <vv99hg$3h92p$1@dont-email.me> References: <TuuNP.2706011$nb1.2053729@fx01.ams4> <991dde3a60e1485815b789520c7149e7842d18f2@i2pn2.org> <vuti3c$jq57$1@dont-email.me> <vutmr6$nvbg$2@dont-email.me> <vutv7r$v5pn$4@dont-email.me> <vuu73m$151a8$3@dont-email.me> <vuuej8$1cqp7$1@dont-email.me> <vuur2n$1qe3m$2@dont-email.me> <vv0352$2ur4q$1@dont-email.me> <vv0kpi$3djh5$1@dont-email.me> <vv13ro$3r3ei$1@dont-email.me> <vv160a$3smj7$1@dont-email.me> <vv18s7$3uer0$1@dont-email.me> <vv1b03$4a4k$2@dont-email.me> <vv1bav$3ra6l$7@dont-email.me> <vv1frt$97hp$1@dont-email.me> <vv1gfu$3ra6l$8@dont-email.me> <vv1js4$d4ik$1@dont-email.me> <-GOdnZvgEPn-84j1nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <vv5e46$3rtqo$1@dont-email.me> <2qydnbbWA6CAGIv1nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <87frhjamvt.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vv93tq$383jd$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 04:58:56 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="18d110b57402f35c65b5688042d33321"; logging-data="3712089"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19WQI43q7WtclPlwISvoB88" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:tbIrdOrxWDk5at/P9D6P7EPeRmQ= In-Reply-To: <vv93tq$383jd$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4415 On 5/4/2025 9:23 PM, olcott wrote: > On 5/4/2025 8:04 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> writes: >> ... >>> As explained above, UTM(⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩) simulates Ĥ run with input Ĥ (having >>> the >>> same halting behaviour) and Ĥ run with input Ĥ HALTS. So embedded_H >>> does >>> not "gather enough information to deduce that UTM(⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩) would never >>> halt". THAT IS JUST A FANTASY THAT YOU HAVE. >>> >>> UTM(⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩) DOES halt, so embedded_H can't possibly gather information >>> that genuinely implies it DOESN'T halt. The explanation is obvious: >>> embedded_H gathers information that *YOU* believe implies that >>> UTM(⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩) >>> would never halt, but *YOU ARE SIMPLY WRONG*. >> >> He used to claim that false ("does not halt") was the correct answer, >> /even though/ the computation in question halts! Those were simpler >> days. Of course cranks will never admit to having been wrong about >> anything other than a detail or two, so anyone who could be bothered >> could try to get him to retract that old claim. >> > > <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022> > If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D > until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never > stop running unless aborted then > > H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D > specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations. > </MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022> > And you *CONTINUE* to lie by implying that Sipser agrees with you when it's been repeated proven that he does not: On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 2:41:27 PM UTC-5, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > I exchanged emails with him about this. He does not agree with anything > substantive that PO has written. I won't quote him, as I don't have > permission, but he was, let's say... forthright, in his reply to me. This demonstrates a reckless disregard for the truth on your part. > When Ĥ is applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ > Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qy ∞ > Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn > > In other words embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ is correct to > reject its input if > > Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* UTM ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qy ∞ > Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* UTM ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn > Would not halt. > In other words, you change the input. Changing the input is not allowed.