Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Peter Olcott admits that DD is NOT correctly simulated by HHH
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 08:24:33 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <vvaam1$d8cv$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vsnchj$23nrb$2@dont-email.me> <vthqtc$5g2e$2@dont-email.me>
 <63af93cb608258cc3e12b9bab3a2efa0b7ee7eee@i2pn2.org>
 <vtit6a$15e5s$3@dont-email.me> <vtivmo$19aqd$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtkc4l$2h48g$3@dont-email.me> <vtkdnm$2iqu5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtkkge$2si58$2@dont-email.me> <vtl56j$3aajg$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtlu0a$3vgp0$1@dont-email.me> <vtm04f$2a90$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtm9q8$aut7$1@dont-email.me> <vtmah8$2a90$2@dont-email.me>
 <vtmgen$gs48$1@dont-email.me> <vtmh1n$2a90$3@dont-email.me>
 <vto4vh$23i07$1@dont-email.me> <vto7qu$267in$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtopqv$2meit$1@dont-email.me> <vung5v$2uf19$1@dont-email.me>
 <vuo87d$3jn5n$3@dont-email.me> <vuq7bm$1gtva$1@dont-email.me>
 <vutfj1$gmbi$5@dont-email.me> <vv21pc$p89b$1@dont-email.me>
 <vv3ql2$2bdhn$1@dont-email.me> <vv4hsh$337ck$1@dont-email.me>
 <vv89co$2erlq$3@dont-email.me>
 <3fa6caebf2ac392178a17360cfa0feaf37c22599@i2pn2.org>
 <vv96d0$3eb4n$1@dont-email.me> <vv99ql$3h92p$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 14:24:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="18d110b57402f35c65b5688042d33321";
	logging-data="434591"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lfG443z4qssLrAZ8OoxRP"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:if0ORavkhTTEj0X8vdAnLDkGN6I=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vv99ql$3h92p$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3383

On 5/4/2025 11:03 PM, dbush wrote:
> On 5/4/2025 10:05 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/4/2025 7:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> But HHH doesn't correct emulated DD by those rules, as those rules do 
>>> not allow HHH to stop its emulation, 
>>
>> Sure they do you freaking moron...
> 
> Then show where in the Intel instruction manual that the execution of 
> any instruction other than a HLT is allowed to stop instead of executing 
> the next instruction.
> 
> Failure to do so in your next reply, or within one hour of your next 
> post on this newsgroup, will be taken as you official on-the-record 
> admission that there is no such allowance and that HHH does NOT 
> correctly simulate DD.

Let the record show that Peter Olcott made the following post in this 
newsgroup after the above message:

On 5/4/2025 11:04 PM, olcott wrote:
 > D *WOULD NEVER STOP RUNNING UNLESS*
 > indicates that professor Sipser was agreeing
 > to hypotheticals AS *NOT CHANGING THE INPUT*
 >
 > You are taking
 > *WOULD NEVER STOP RUNNING UNLESS*
 > to mean *NEVER STOPS RUNNING* that is incorrect.

And has made no attempt after over 9 hours to show where in the Intel 
instruction manual that execution is allowed to stop after any 
instruction other than HLT.

Therefore, as per the above criteria:

LET THE RECORD SHOW

That Peter Olcott

Has *officially* admitted

That DD is NOT correctly simulated by HHH