| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vvacnWatMJsMZif7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 06:22:09 +0000 Subject: Re: Can I safely install linux on Lenovo ideapad Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc References: <v9dkl6$3dtus$1@dont-email.me> <qKqcnVmjvZb1cSf7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <Q9CuO.314355$ewT2.307029@fx09.iad> From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> Organization: vector apex Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 02:22:08 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <Q9CuO.314355$ewT2.307029@fx09.iad> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <vvacnWatMJsMZif7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> Lines: 35 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97 X-Trace: sv3-AEdZAR3zSceK+AKJ139+5sHZ56pBgZGSdZSdloTVb2HcejXRToL39AT/ME2fbD/0A7nVApgtEN3svyD!tUCTzKnzdZdFJUjA8AB3bicjmW4OE6543QV0Msc02PUPzBk0qqCJN2SQelUMlWMtT7qJs4TSWi1p!Eq1g3q9lQ9rZ4AS+JMR7 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2902 On 8/13/24 1:28 AM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2024-08-13, 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote: > >> A slower option is to install VirtualBox in Winders >> and install Linux as a virtual machine. The advantage >> is that it's always handily available, the downside >> is that the VM is slower than a 'bare metal' install. > > If it's slower, it's not by much. A Windows VM is quite > fast enough for me. I have a report progam test bed with > a .BAT file that runs the program several dozen times with > various options; on small files it will flicker the screen > 10 times a second with consecutive executions, and it will > process million-record files in 5 seconds. With resources properly allocated a VM can be fairly speedy these days. I'd still rather go bare metal ... but then I'm from Back In The Day. THIS poster sounded more of a Win guy looking to explore Linux without risk to his (mistakenly) beloved Winders. Dual-boot IS technically better - but, for him, a VM may be the best way to go, little risk of serious damage. With luck he'll decide Linux IS the better way and PURGE M$ entirely from his laptop :-) Just looking at the shelf, I have FOUR lower-end laptops ... ALL pure Linux. Makes a cheap laptop into a fairly speedy laptop - plus no M$ ! Actually I have NO M$ boxes at all, haven't for a LONG LONG time, but EIGHT active Linux units not including the laptops. Accidentally bought an extra BMax unit, but I think that's gonna be a BSD eventually, MAYBE Plan-9 just to be weird.