| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vvb5bd$sv26$5@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Is Snow White going to make money? Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 15:59:40 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 68 Message-ID: <vvb5bd$sv26$5@dont-email.me> References: <vvb3vg$sv26$4@dont-email.me> <tv4i1kd66fakro7c4p2h7fide4a3e692l1@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 21:59:44 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8e4ebab9f5d818199dd93423582e52d"; logging-data="949318"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/kCYPhHEQ/gavdzxoyIO4n05BfIQSwPzM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:BodpmRlz3sZt2mjwc2yH9U2CT8Q= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250505-6, 5/5/2025), Outbound message In-Reply-To: <tv4i1kd66fakro7c4p2h7fide4a3e692l1@4ax.com> Content-Language: en-CA Bytes: 4073 On 2025-05-05 3:42 PM, shawn wrote: > On Mon, 5 May 2025 15:36:15 -0400, Rhino > <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote: > >> Just out of curiousity, I looked up Snow White at IMDB just now and was >> pleased to see that the rating has stayed steady at 1.6 out of 10. >> However I was rather surprised to see the box office returns. At the >> moment, we have the following numbers: >> >> ================================== >> Budget >> $250,000,000 (estimated) >> >> Gross US & Canada >> $86,123,346 >> >> Opening weekend US & Canada >> $42,206,415 Mar 23, 2025 >> >> Gross worldwide >> $200,568,210 >> ================================= >> >> Despite the miserable opening weekend it had in the US and Canada (and >> the much worse one it had in China, one of its biggest markets, where it >> made less than 2 million!), the film continues to make money and is >> already at 200 million dollars, which is 80% if its (estimated) budget. >> It looks like there is a real chance that it will break even. Any money >> it makes after that is actual profit! (I expect these numbers don't >> include marketing costs, which can be tens or even hundreds of millions >> of dollars, but Disney cut back drastically on marketing when it was >> obvious the film was going to be really awful.) > > The marketing budget for this film is very likely at least one hundred > million. Which means this film won't make back the budget in the > theaters. Maybe after streaming and DVD sales it will barely make a > profit, but Disney isn't in the business of barely making a profit. So > there is no way they can look at these results as a good thing. > >> Wouldn't it be wild if a film that was so reviled by practically >> everyone still made money? > > Lots of films that shouldn't can make money eventually. I remember that Waterworld was the biggest budget film ever when it was released and tanked in the US and Canada - it was out of the theatres in either one week or two - but it eventually made money by virtue of a decent reception in foreign markets. I'm sure that was a great relief to Kevin Costner, who I believe financed a lot of it. >> >> I wonder if Disney executives will use this as a rationale for >> continuing to make woke garbage on the grounds that, whatever the >> critical reaction, it's still profitable so why not stay with a >> "winning" formula? > > It's not the Disney way to barely make a profit. Bring home wheel > barrows of cash or don't bother is their approach so this movie is a > clear failure. Let's hope they learn a lesson about what audiences want - and what they don't want - from Snow White.... As for Rachel Zegler, I see a future for her that involves being the Hispanic Greta Thunberg, agitating about whatever causes obsess her while she looks back on the film career that might have been. -- Rhino