Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/2002): No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (2002) No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it.
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vvbp2c$1p548$1@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vvbp2c$1p548$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Case Insensitive File Systems -- Torvalds Hates Them
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 01:36:12 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <vvbp2c$1p548$1@dont-email.me>
References: <pan$4068a$3910f4f1$8cbecede$9e42905e@linux.rocks>
	<20250428080014.0000347f@gmail.com> <m79tdsF2bf6U1@mid.individual.net>
	<20250428111242.00007426@gmail.com>
	<pan$c046d$e87ef491$a3427b7a$ac576dbc@linux.rocks>
	<slrn1011nu8.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <vurjl9$2pskn$1@dont-email.me>
	<slrn1013t50.1aev.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
	<vAGdnR-Fj9qGS4_1nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<slrn1016uic.2qk.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <m7hgt7F8mvgU5@mid.individual.net>
	<6813f997@news.ausics.net> <vvbe5q$1em7m$1@dont-email.me>
	<68194581@news.ausics.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 06 May 2025 03:36:13 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="349069d38c665b81431ffd24f6d09b8d";
	logging-data="1873032"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Qo20Xl3W0fwBoSeHSpYng"
User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bZCkrmQXkR95mhaVoT7QBGO+qQE=
Bytes: 1941

On 6 May 2025 09:10:57 +1000, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

> Perhaps, but since he wasn't using existing UNIX filesystems and using a
> custom one instead, it seems to me like he had a choice.

Linux is supposed to be POSIX-compliant (at least the parts of POSIX that 
people care about).

> After all you can still use FAT or NTFS on Linux even though they have
> more disallowed filename characters.

Those are Dimdows file systems. They are not POSIX-compliant.