| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vvd2kk$30799$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: RP2040 zero Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 14:25:40 +0100 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 36 Message-ID: <vvd2kk$30799$1@dont-email.me> References: <vvcmv8$2lcjh$1@dont-email.me> <m7u6k6F9pksU1@mid.individual.net> <n-q*2NNbA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <m7ufkmFb8i3U2@mid.individual.net> <n-q*wmObA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 06 May 2025 15:25:41 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c2dcbdb979f42bae6de576cc4fea6623"; logging-data="3153193"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+wFGA3zkiHU1az+O9iyUdiqpzwl3AAzPY=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Tw4foNOF909Nbk+fHd0yotoCCuo= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <n-q*wmObA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> Bytes: 2702 On 06/05/2025 14:19, Theo wrote: > Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote: >> the BusPirate folks had issues with their BP5XL boards and needed to >> junk a batch, I see that redesigned as the BP6 it's now on sale ... > > Yes, that's the kind of application where it's a problem. You attach GPIOs > to random stuff and intend to probe what's there. That means you flip > through the internal settings for input/output/pullup/pulldown and listen > out to how the input changes. > > The leakage affects that kind of application badly (input pins should be > high impedance but they aren't here) but if you are putting the chip in a > board where you already know what's on the other end of the pin, you can > design the circuit appropriately. > > RPis are more likely to be used in situations where you take the MCU and > plug in and out random things onto the pins which are affected by it, > compared with other MCUs where they only ever get put on vendor PCBs where > everything is predetermined in the schematic. So it's really a hobbyist > focused problem rather than a wider problem. > > Theo All my Pis end up on my design of PCB where stuff is either disabled or its strictly controlled I cant see why anyone would enable an input pin and leave it floating. Its simply bad design -- “It is hard to imagine a more stupid decision or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.” Thomas Sowell