| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vvdg0s$3cbpq$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 12:14:04 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 45 Message-ID: <vvdg0s$3cbpq$3@dont-email.me> References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vva50q$24vr$1@news.muc.de> <vvalp5$o6v5$2@dont-email.me> <vvanjf$1fho$1@news.muc.de> <vvaske$vta4$1@dont-email.me> <vvavfg$1fho$2@news.muc.de> <vvb0un$vtiu$6@dont-email.me> <vvb1dd$1fho$3@news.muc.de> <vvb36j$15u5b$2@dont-email.me> <eb8abe33ea9ae6ee3d02c22974a73e5559c0400f@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 06 May 2025 19:14:05 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4d3877b25e07ae675aebb853b858fd37"; logging-data="3551034"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18h4vX7Qkbe1n/XqBoJdpPG" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ywFz6DmcBqYFDj61zgeaOXW3rCs= In-Reply-To: <eb8abe33ea9ae6ee3d02c22974a73e5559c0400f@i2pn2.org> X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250506-4, 5/6/2025), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3194 On 5/6/2025 5:04 AM, joes wrote: > Am Mon, 05 May 2025 14:22:58 -0500 schrieb olcott: >> On 5/5/2025 1:52 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/5/2025 1:19 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 5/5/2025 11:05 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Follow the details of the proof of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem, >>>>>>> and apply them to your "system". That will give you your counter >>>>>>> example. >>> >>>>>> My system does not do "provable" instead it does "provably true". >>> >>>>> I don't know anything about your "system" and I don't care. If it's >>>>> a formal system with anything above minimal capabilities, Gödel's >>>>> Theorem applies to it, and the "system" will be incomplete (in >>>>> Gödel's sense). >>> >>>> I reformulate the entire notion of "formal system" >>>> so that undecidability ceases to be possible. >>> >>> Liar. That is impossible. >>> >> When you start with truth and only apply truth preserving operations >> then you necessarily end up with truth. > Truth such as Gödel's undecidability theorem, but not all truths. > The entire body of all general knowledge that can be expressed using language is included in the system that I propose. Undecidability cannot possibly occur in any system that ONLY derives True(x) by applying truth preserving operations to basic facts that are stipulated to be true. LP = "This sentence is not true." True(LP) == FALSE True(~LP) == FALSE Proves that LP is not a valid proposition with a truth value. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer