Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!.POSTED.panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.fandom,rec.music.filk
Subject: Re: Balticon code of conduct
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 22:43:48 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: United Individualist
Message-ID: <vve3b4$3nc$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <vvdaia$38n31$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 22:43:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix3.panix.com:166.84.1.3";
	logging-data="3820"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)

Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
> With Balticon coming around again, I took another look at their code
> of conduct.  It still has some disturbing features, and I'm not
> going, although it's within a day's driving distance and will likely
> have a good filk program.

I too no longer attend Balticon.  Partly for the same two reasons as
you, their rule against ever criticizing any person or group and their
unprovoked attack on Stephanie Burke.  And partly because of their
having secret rules and secret interpretations of their non-secret
rules.  For instance it's the only con I know of for which it's
considered harassment for you to politely ask someone to please leave
you alone.

Also, many of the people I went there to see no longer go there.

Also, the increasing cost of living is causing me to be much more
selective as to which events I attend.  I used to average five or
six cons each year.  Now it's more often just one or two.

At a fannish event last July, two BSFS board member were talking about
recent Balticons being unable to get volunteers or staff members.
(BSFS is the organization that runs Balticon.)  A couple hours later,
there was a conversation about a proposal to ban Worldcons from
totalitarian countries such as China.  One fan, a lawyer, suggested
that it would be difficult to define "totalitarian" rigorously.
Someone suggested that it should be defined as, if someone denounces
the nation's ruler during opening ceremonies, they would go to jail.
Someone objected that lots of cons have rules against criticizing
people.  Only then did I speak up, and say that cons can't jail you,
but can only kick you out -- and that I wasn't aware of any cons that
had any such rule, except Balticon, at which point I looked directly
at the two BSFS board members.  They stared back at me with looks of
utter hatred.  I think I also mentioned that, so long as the con makes
no secret of that rule, that people can simply choose not to attend,
as many, including me, have done with Balticon.

In short, I think Balticon is slowly dying due to dysfunctional
management.

For the record, I attended 23 Balticons, followed by two virtual
Balticons during the pandemic.  I volunteered at all of them, often
arriving a day early and leaving a day late so as to held with setup
and teardown, and with loading and unloading.
-- 
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.