Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vvea4n$4qvf$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Judges discover constitutional rights to bike lanes and also drug use in homeless shelters
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 00:39:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <vvea4n$4qvf$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vvde7f$30ifl$1@dont-email.me> <vvdmn5$30ifl$3@dont-email.me> <vvdnt9$3kqjl$1@dont-email.me> <vve687$265b$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 02:39:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="56160c3a318aa549751e5c7226aaa9fe";
	logging-data="158703"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19xR6ZM9KT0RSEYVIdTLM+vsTE2b/AZ3Ps="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KEJm2XUC+CrFR8J9g3mgFebnd2A=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>Here's a guy who stuck it to NYC when they tried to tell him he owned the
>sidewalk and the street for purposes of personal injury liability for
>pedestrians and cars.

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doQBGhwKVR0

>"The property is yours when ownership is inconvenient and expensive for us,
>but it's ours when we want it for parking and sidewalks."

Good point

Ok. I could have done without the narrator and his ads, but that's
un-fucking believable. 100s of assistant corporation counsels and they
forget to obtain an easement? I wonder if there are utilities down
there. Bet the city is going to have to pay him, plus reimbursement for
the judgment against him for the woman.