Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vvg8tk$15e69$4@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for
 unknowns and unknowable
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 13:31:16 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vvg8tk$15e69$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me>
 <b47c9e70d415c1e5e469aaab846f0bd05e4bcc51@i2pn2.org>
 <vvall0$o6v5$1@dont-email.me> <vvc33h$25atc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvcgja$1voc$1@news.muc.de> <vvd6pf$34l9k$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvdads$13pc$1@news.muc.de> <vvdcld$3arjo$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvg6r9$15e69$1@dont-email.me> <vvg7uu$158tp$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 20:31:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ee5137430f56269cd3e6381ddf24cf46";
	logging-data="1226953"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18hd9YUfKvl4Jfka0aLUS9N"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CLIc4131VFmCoM3ROHCMuFZcFXg=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <vvg7uu$158tp$4@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250507-4, 5/7/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2552

On 5/7/2025 1:14 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 07/05/2025 18:55, olcott wrote:
>> When THERE IS NO CONTRADICTION then proof by contradiction fails.
>> How do you not get that?
> 
> I do. You must be talking about the Olcott Problem again, because the 
> contradiction is inherent in the Halting Problem.
> 

Not when its terrible mistake is corrected.

> It starts with the assumption that a universal halt decider can be 
> written, and then shows that such a decider can be used to devise a 
> program that the 'universal' decider can't decide --- a contradiction.
> 
> But you already know all this.
> 

I already know that the contradictory part of the
counter-example input has always been unreachable code.

Thus PROOF BY CONTRADICTION FAILS because there never
was any actual contradiction. It has been a false assumption
that there has been a contradiction for 90 years.

If you have no idea what unreachable code is you won't
get this.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer