Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for
 unknowns and unknowable
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 18:09:16 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <vvgp6s$1a47o$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me>
 <b47c9e70d415c1e5e469aaab846f0bd05e4bcc51@i2pn2.org>
 <vvall0$o6v5$1@dont-email.me> <vvc33h$25atc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvcgja$1voc$1@news.muc.de> <vvd6pf$34l9k$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvdads$13pc$1@news.muc.de> <vvdcld$3arjo$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvg6r9$15e69$1@dont-email.me> <vvg7uu$158tp$4@dont-email.me>
 <vvg8tk$15e69$4@dont-email.me> <vvgai8$158tp$6@dont-email.me>
 <vvgcme$15e69$9@dont-email.me> <vvgjdo$18i6e$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvgkao$18q46$1@dont-email.me> <vvgknf$18i5r$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvgl47$18q46$4@dont-email.me> <vvgm45$18i6e$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 01:09:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f36da193996cadd52a214445b52881fc";
	logging-data="1380600"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/OosOEdu4bH3AtPG2Jx8kF"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JJsDxeItSi2y0lEghKYYXboYN00=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250507-4, 5/7/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vvgm45$18i6e$4@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2840

On 5/7/2025 5:16 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 07/05/2025 22:59, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/7/2025 4:52 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>> On 07/05/2025 22:46, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 5/7/2025 4:30 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>> If the simulation can't reach code that the directly executed 
>>>>> program reaches, then it's not a faithful simulation.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If is was true that it is not a faithful simulation
>>>> then you would be able to show exactly what sequence
>>>> of instructions would be a faithful simulation.
>>>
>>> If it were false, you'd be able to chop out the unreachable code 
>>> without any adverse effects. Can you?
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>
>> I already know the answer.
> 
> Then you already know why your simulation code fails to simulate 
> correctly... 

When I say correctly I mean according to the
rules of the x86 language.

When you say "correctly" you mean break the rules
of the x86 language to match a misconception.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer