Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vvjeqf$28555$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input
 to HHH(DD)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 00:30:23 +0100
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <vvjeqf$28555$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vvgov4$1a47o$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvgp8b$15i5e$25@dont-email.me> <vvgpk6$1a47o$4@dont-email.me>
 <vvgpo7$15i5e$26@dont-email.me> <vvgq6o$1acph$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvgqgl$15i5e$27@dont-email.me> <vvgr22$1ag3a$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvgt36$1auqp$2@dont-email.me> <vvgtbe$1b0li$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvguot$1auqp$3@dont-email.me> <vvh0t2$1b939$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhap5$1hp80$1@dont-email.me> <vvhf20$1ihs9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhfnd$1hvei$3@dont-email.me> <vvil99$1ugd5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvinvp$1vglb$1@dont-email.me> <vviv75$222r6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvj1fp$22a62$1@dont-email.me> <vvj2j6$23gk7$1@dont-email.me>
 <as9TP.251456$lZjd.93653@fx05.ams4> <87msbmeo3b.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjcge$27753$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 01:30:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2b573b17a97b3b771864cdd7a1499e84";
	logging-data="2364581"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18A1JYjHttBdysDABRfsIXcsS3VRBGG5/jmyoRwbz0sJA=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UFeFsZdqY7xr06oPzrg+g76Ea+8=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vvjcge$27753$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2706

On 08/05/2025 23:50, olcott wrote:
> On 5/8/2025 5:26 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:

<snip>

>> No, the problem Richard was pointing out with olcott's Halt7.c 
>> is that
>> *it's not valid C".
>>

<snip>

> 
> void DDD()
> {
>    HHH(DDD);
>    return;
> }
> 
> If you are a competent C programmer

Keith Thompson is a highly-respected and very competent C 
programmer. You, however, are not.

> then you
> know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot
> possibly each its own "return" instruction.

Assumes facts not in evidence. Whether HHH correctly simulates 
DDD is disputed by a number of people. Your C code has a number 
of issues, and Mike Terry has pointed out exactly how the 
simulator fails to simulate.

What's left standing? Anything?

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within