| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vvjeqf$28555$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input
to HHH(DD)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 00:30:23 +0100
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <vvjeqf$28555$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vvgov4$1a47o$2@dont-email.me>
<vvgp8b$15i5e$25@dont-email.me> <vvgpk6$1a47o$4@dont-email.me>
<vvgpo7$15i5e$26@dont-email.me> <vvgq6o$1acph$1@dont-email.me>
<vvgqgl$15i5e$27@dont-email.me> <vvgr22$1ag3a$2@dont-email.me>
<vvgt36$1auqp$2@dont-email.me> <vvgtbe$1b0li$1@dont-email.me>
<vvguot$1auqp$3@dont-email.me> <vvh0t2$1b939$1@dont-email.me>
<vvhap5$1hp80$1@dont-email.me> <vvhf20$1ihs9$1@dont-email.me>
<vvhfnd$1hvei$3@dont-email.me> <vvil99$1ugd5$1@dont-email.me>
<vvinvp$1vglb$1@dont-email.me> <vviv75$222r6$1@dont-email.me>
<vvj1fp$22a62$1@dont-email.me> <vvj2j6$23gk7$1@dont-email.me>
<as9TP.251456$lZjd.93653@fx05.ams4> <87msbmeo3b.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
<vvjcge$27753$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 01:30:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2b573b17a97b3b771864cdd7a1499e84";
logging-data="2364581"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18A1JYjHttBdysDABRfsIXcsS3VRBGG5/jmyoRwbz0sJA=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UFeFsZdqY7xr06oPzrg+g76Ea+8=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vvjcge$27753$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2706
On 08/05/2025 23:50, olcott wrote:
> On 5/8/2025 5:26 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
<snip>
>> No, the problem Richard was pointing out with olcott's Halt7.c
>> is that
>> *it's not valid C".
>>
<snip>
>
> void DDD()
> {
> HHH(DDD);
> return;
> }
>
> If you are a competent C programmer
Keith Thompson is a highly-respected and very competent C
programmer. You, however, are not.
> then you
> know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot
> possibly each its own "return" instruction.
Assumes facts not in evidence. Whether HHH correctly simulates
DDD is disputed by a number of people. Your C code has a number
of issues, and Mike Terry has pointed out exactly how the
simulator fails to simulate.
What's left standing? Anything?
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within