Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input
 to HHH(DD)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 10:33:27 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 79
Message-ID: <vvl787$2rl0l$7@dont-email.me>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vvgpk6$1a47o$4@dont-email.me>
 <vvgpo7$15i5e$26@dont-email.me> <vvgq6o$1acph$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvgqgl$15i5e$27@dont-email.me> <vvgr22$1ag3a$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvgt36$1auqp$2@dont-email.me> <vvgtbe$1b0li$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvguot$1auqp$3@dont-email.me> <vvh0t2$1b939$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhap5$1hp80$1@dont-email.me> <vvhf20$1ihs9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhfnd$1hvei$3@dont-email.me> <vvil99$1ugd5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvinvp$1vglb$1@dont-email.me> <vviv75$222r6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvj1fp$22a62$1@dont-email.me> <vvj2j6$23gk7$1@dont-email.me>
 <as9TP.251456$lZjd.93653@fx05.ams4> <87msbmeo3b.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjc9b$27753$1@dont-email.me> <87ecwyekg2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjg6a$28g5i$3@dont-email.me> <vvkev4$2m36t$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 17:33:28 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b8226b0a928845ead4a9adb4b3b34c7d";
	logging-data="3003413"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX198sxMEPGlHoeYXZacZJVY6"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Au1srhHWb5SjbJY5jmoaIilfioU=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250509-2, 5/9/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <vvkev4$2m36t$2@dont-email.me>

On 5/9/2025 3:39 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 09.mei.2025 om 01:53 schreef olcott:
>> On 5/8/2025 6:45 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> On 5/8/2025 5:26 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> I am more nearly an expert on C than on the Halting Problem.
>>>>> Watching olcott base his arguments on C *and getting C so badly
>>>>> wrong* leads me to think that he is largely ignorant of C (which is
>>>>> fine, most people are) and is unwilling to admit it.  Watching the
>>>>> reactions of actual experts to his mathematical arguments leads me
>>>>> to the same conclusion about his knowledge of the relevant fields
>>>>> of mathematics.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If Halt7.c is not compiled with the Microsoft
>>>> compiler then it will not produce the required
>>>> object file type.
>>>>
>>>> The rest of the system has compiled under
>>>> Linux. I haven't tried this in a few years.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> So you normally compile your code using the 2017 version of Microsoft
>>> Visual Studio.
>>>
>>> I have no particular problem with that, but your failure to correct
>>> a number of C errors in your code is odd. 
>>
>> As I already proved Microsoft reported no such errors.
>>
>>>  I've pointed out several
>>> syntax errors and constraint violations; at least the syntax errors
>>> would be trivial to fix (even if your compiler is lax enough to
>>> fail to diagnose them).  Richard Heathfield has pointed out code
>>> that dereferences a null pointer.
>>>
>>
>> Mike corrected Richard on this.
>> Those are stub functions intercepted
>> by x86utm the operating system.
>>
>>> You are using C, a language in which you appear to have little
>>> apparent expertise or willingness to learn, to demonstrate claims
>>> that, if true, would overturn ideas that have been generally accepted
>>> for decades.  Can you understand why I might decide that analyzing
>>> your claims is not worth my time?
>>>
>>
>> I learned C back when K & R was the standard.
>>
>> void DDD()
>> {
>>    HHH(DDD);
>>    return;
>> }
>>
>> We don't need to look at any of my code for me
>> to totally prove my point. For example when
>> the above DDD is correctly simulated by HHH
>> this simulated DDD cannot possibly reach its own
>> "return" instruction.
>>
>>
> 
> A vacuous statement, because HHH cannot correctly simulate DDD, which 
> includes HHH itself.
> A vacuous statement does not prove anything.

You are saying that the smartest genius (not me)
in the universe cannot possibly create an HHH
that simulates itself simulating DDD?

What is the evidence for this wild-eyed claim?

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer