Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input
 to HHH(DD)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 10:59:17 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <vvl8ol$2rl0l$14@dont-email.me>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vvgq6o$1acph$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvgqgl$15i5e$27@dont-email.me> <vvgr22$1ag3a$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvgt36$1auqp$2@dont-email.me> <vvgtbe$1b0li$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvguot$1auqp$3@dont-email.me> <vvh0t2$1b939$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhap5$1hp80$1@dont-email.me> <vvhf20$1ihs9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhfnd$1hvei$3@dont-email.me> <vvil99$1ugd5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvinvp$1vglb$1@dont-email.me> <vviv75$222r6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvj1fp$22a62$1@dont-email.me> <vvj2j6$23gk7$1@dont-email.me>
 <as9TP.251456$lZjd.93653@fx05.ams4> <87msbmeo3b.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjcge$27753$2@dont-email.me> <vvjeqf$28555$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvjffg$28g5i$1@dont-email.me> <875xiaejzg.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjgt1$28g5i$5@dont-email.me> <vvkg76$2m36t$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 17:59:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b8226b0a928845ead4a9adb4b3b34c7d";
	logging-data="3003413"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18N+jeyPGuc2ODFdvAJbvGc"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iW6q+FqTiXk/gPx5tTIpliOWC/4=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250509-2, 5/9/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vvkg76$2m36t$5@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3542

On 5/9/2025 4:00 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 09.mei.2025 om 02:05 schreef olcott:
>> On 5/8/2025 6:54 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> On 5/8/2025 6:30 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>>> On 08/05/2025 23:50, olcott wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>>> If you are a competent C programmer
>>>>> Keith Thompson is a highly-respected and very competent C
>>>>> programmer.
>>>>
>>>> *Then he is just who I need*
>>>
>>> No, what you need is someone who is an expert in mathematical logic
>>> (I am not) who can explain to you, in terms you can understand and
>>> accept, where you've gone wrong.  Some expertise in C could also
>>> be helpful.
>>>
>>
>> The key gap in my proof is that none of the comp.sci
>> people seems to have a slight clue about simple C
>> programming.
>>
>> void DDD()
>> {
>>    HHH(DDD);
>>    return;
>> }
>>
>> *THIS IS THE C PART THAT NO ONE HERE UNDERSTANDS*
>> DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly
>> reach its own "return" instruction.
> 
> The HHH that you propose and is included in DDD does halt. But it is 
> known that this HHH prematurely aborts which makes it impossible for the 
> simulation to reach the reachable 'return'. HHH simply ignores the 
> conditional abort in the simulation.
> 

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}

When 1 or more statements of DDD are correctly
simulated by HHH then this correctly simulated
DDD cannot possibly reach its own “return statement”.



-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer