Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vvm9bv$34h6f$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD) Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 02:15:42 +0100 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 22 Message-ID: <vvm9bv$34h6f$3@dont-email.me> References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vvgr22$1ag3a$2@dont-email.me> <vvgt36$1auqp$2@dont-email.me> <vvgtbe$1b0li$1@dont-email.me> <vvguot$1auqp$3@dont-email.me> <vvh0t2$1b939$1@dont-email.me> <vvhap5$1hp80$1@dont-email.me> <vvhf20$1ihs9$1@dont-email.me> <vvhfnd$1hvei$3@dont-email.me> <vvil99$1ugd5$1@dont-email.me> <vvinvp$1vglb$1@dont-email.me> <vviv75$222r6$1@dont-email.me> <vvj1fp$22a62$1@dont-email.me> <vvj2j6$23gk7$1@dont-email.me> <as9TP.251456$lZjd.93653@fx05.ams4> <87msbmeo3b.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvjcge$27753$2@dont-email.me> <87a57mek8r.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvjgh7$28g5i$4@dont-email.me> <87seled0zy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvjobj$28g5i$11@dont-email.me> <87zffmbeyt.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvm1ih$33907$1@dont-email.me> <vvm6ku$34h6f$2@dont-email.me> <vvm7tl$34mm4$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 03:15:43 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="43b083a872fadb3f2c7703b3081889c2"; logging-data="3294415"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+NT065v5keDeQ6+7a73Lw2GmU/UVGGC88+41HifY5OZQ==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:bKsgvDh+Xgh9lD6xn5xnivqeZpU= In-Reply-To: <vvm7tl$34mm4$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2589 On 10/05/2025 01:51, olcott wrote: > On 5/9/2025 7:29 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: >> On 10/05/2025 00:02, olcott wrote: >>> Correctly emulating one or more instructions <is> >>> the correct emulation of 1 or more instructions >>> of DD. This is a truism. >> >> No, it's not. Correct emulation would entail accurately >> simulating the whole of DDD's behaviour. > > It is stupidly wrong to require the complete > emulation of a non-terminating input. It is touchingly naive to think you can persuade people to accept incomplete emulation as 'correct'. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within