Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input
 to HHH(DD)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 21:45:24 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vvmek5$3a34p$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vvgr22$1ag3a$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvgt36$1auqp$2@dont-email.me> <vvgtbe$1b0li$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvguot$1auqp$3@dont-email.me> <vvh0t2$1b939$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhap5$1hp80$1@dont-email.me> <vvhf20$1ihs9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhfnd$1hvei$3@dont-email.me> <vvil99$1ugd5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvinvp$1vglb$1@dont-email.me> <vviv75$222r6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvj1fp$22a62$1@dont-email.me> <vvj2j6$23gk7$1@dont-email.me>
 <as9TP.251456$lZjd.93653@fx05.ams4> <87msbmeo3b.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjcge$27753$2@dont-email.me> <87a57mek8r.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjgh7$28g5i$4@dont-email.me> <87seled0zy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjobj$28g5i$11@dont-email.me> <87zffmbeyt.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvm1ih$33907$1@dont-email.me> <vvm6ku$34h6f$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvm7tl$34mm4$2@dont-email.me>
 <333c8b6f6e812540c009a5e10118b00c57adb3c6@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 04:45:25 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7be348abb5bc2ec0a70724586a3ca680";
	logging-data="3476633"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX180aibBT4trsvLHH/Vitx5R"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6TBwpoQpyFnBjjewxhJ8LUOxaLo=
In-Reply-To: <333c8b6f6e812540c009a5e10118b00c57adb3c6@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250509-6, 5/9/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US

On 5/9/2025 9:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/9/25 8:51 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/9/2025 7:29 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2025 00:02, olcott wrote:
>>>> Correctly emulating one or more instructions <is>
>>>> the correct emulation of 1 or more instructions
>>>> of DD. This is a truism.
>>>
>>> No, it's not. Correct emulation would entail accurately simulating 
>>> the whole of DDD's behaviour.
>>>
>>
>> It is stupidly wrong to require the complete
>> emulation of a non-terminating input.
>>
> 
> Nope, as that *IS* the definition of a correct emulation of a non- 
> halting input, as the definition of "correcdt emulation" is to exactly 
> reproduce the behavior of that program, so if the program won't halt, 
> neither can the emulation.
> 

That a psychotic way to define a simulating termination analyzer.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer