Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vvmeoi$3a34p$4@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vvmeoi$3a34p$4@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input
 to HHH(DD)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 21:47:45 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <vvmeoi$3a34p$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vvguot$1auqp$3@dont-email.me>
 <vvh0t2$1b939$1@dont-email.me> <vvhap5$1hp80$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhf20$1ihs9$1@dont-email.me> <vvhfnd$1hvei$3@dont-email.me>
 <vvil99$1ugd5$1@dont-email.me> <vvinvp$1vglb$1@dont-email.me>
 <vviv75$222r6$1@dont-email.me> <vvj1fp$22a62$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvj2j6$23gk7$1@dont-email.me> <as9TP.251456$lZjd.93653@fx05.ams4>
 <87msbmeo3b.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvjcge$27753$2@dont-email.me>
 <87a57mek8r.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvjgh7$28g5i$4@dont-email.me>
 <87seled0zy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvjobj$28g5i$11@dont-email.me>
 <87zffmbeyt.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvm1ih$33907$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvm6ku$34h6f$2@dont-email.me> <vvm7tl$34mm4$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvm9bv$34h6f$3@dont-email.me> <vvma5d$34vcu$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvmabo$34h6g$3@dont-email.me> <vvmb9d$35ds5$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvmcsj$34h6g$4@dont-email.me> <vvmd54$39lof$2@dont-email.me>
 <55e8616cd348689d709970345f2f012d41a9396c@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 04:47:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7be348abb5bc2ec0a70724586a3ca680";
	logging-data="3476633"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ydA4mmi1dgKvphsF9vP4r"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sUNTAYT+FEy1Pn25d0Pz3eaY/z0=
In-Reply-To: <55e8616cd348689d709970345f2f012d41a9396c@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250509-6, 5/9/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US

On 5/9/2025 9:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/9/25 10:20 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/9/2025 9:15 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2025 02:48, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 5/9/2025 8:32 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>>> On 10/05/2025 02:29, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/9/2025 8:15 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/05/2025 01:51, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 5/9/2025 7:29 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/05/2025 00:02, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Correctly emulating one or more instructions <is>
>>>>>>>>>> the correct emulation of 1 or more instructions
>>>>>>>>>> of DD. This is a truism.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, it's not. Correct emulation would entail accurately 
>>>>>>>>> simulating the whole of DDD's behaviour.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is stupidly wrong to require the complete
>>>>>>>> emulation of a non-terminating input.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is touchingly naive to think you can persuade people to accept 
>>>>>>> incomplete emulation as 'correct'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If one instruction is emulated correctly
>>>>>> then is is dishonest to say that zero
>>>>>> instructions were emulated correctly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which instruction do you think is emulated correctly?
>>>
>>>> _DDD()
>>>> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>>>
>>>
>>> Assumes facts not in evidence. Your HHH function is in a translation 
>>> unit that contains a syntax error.
>>>
>>
>> It is a truism that when DDD is emulated by HHH
>> according to the rules of the x86 language that
>> the first four instructions of DDD would be emulated
>> and then HHH would also be required to emulate
>> itself emulating DDD.
>>
> 
> Nope, because by your definitions HHH can not correctly emulate that 
> DDD, as it doesn't include the code for the HHH that it calls, 

DDD are HHH are on the same memory space I told you this 50 times
DDD are HHH are on the same memory space I told you this 50 times
DDD are HHH are on the same memory space I told you this 50 times
DDD are HHH are on the same memory space I told you this 50 times
DDD are HHH are on the same memory space I told you this 50 times

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer