Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input
 to HHH(DD)
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 09:33:50 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <vvno4e$3in62$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vvgr22$1ag3a$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvgt36$1auqp$2@dont-email.me> <vvgtbe$1b0li$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvguot$1auqp$3@dont-email.me> <vvh0t2$1b939$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhap5$1hp80$1@dont-email.me> <vvhf20$1ihs9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhfnd$1hvei$3@dont-email.me> <vvil99$1ugd5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvinvp$1vglb$1@dont-email.me> <vviv75$222r6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvj1fp$22a62$1@dont-email.me> <vvj2j6$23gk7$1@dont-email.me>
 <as9TP.251456$lZjd.93653@fx05.ams4> <87msbmeo3b.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjcge$27753$2@dont-email.me> <vvjeqf$28555$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvjffg$28g5i$1@dont-email.me> <875xiaejzg.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjgt1$28g5i$5@dont-email.me> <87jz6qczja.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjotc$28g5i$12@dont-email.me>
 <vvnh9u$3hd96$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 16:33:51 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7be348abb5bc2ec0a70724586a3ca680";
	logging-data="3759298"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+0Pieti/HdNm+dHxQkBGcn"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XdeffqnFT0w5XcnyjOYpnVszn+M=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250510-2, 5/10/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vvnh9u$3hd96$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
Bytes: 3045

On 5/10/2025 7:37 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 09.05.2025 um 04:22 schrieb olcott:
> 
>> Look at their replies to this post.
>> Not a one of them will agree that
>>
>> void DDD()
>> {
>>    HHH(DDD);
>>    return; // final halt state
>> }
>>
>> When 1 or more instructions of DDD are correctly
>> simulated by HHH then the correctly simulated DDD cannot
>> possibly reach its "return" instruction (final halt state).
>>
>> They have consistently disagreed with this
>> simple point for three years.
> 
> I guess that not even a professor of theoretical computer
> science would spend years working on so few lines of code.
> 

I created a whole x86utm operating system.
It correctly determines that the halting problem's
otherwise "impossible" input is actually non halting.

int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}

https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer