Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input
 to HHH(DD)
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 10:45:18 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <vvnsae$3in62$9@dont-email.me>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vvgr22$1ag3a$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvgt36$1auqp$2@dont-email.me> <vvgtbe$1b0li$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvguot$1auqp$3@dont-email.me> <vvh0t2$1b939$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhap5$1hp80$1@dont-email.me> <vvhf20$1ihs9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvhfnd$1hvei$3@dont-email.me> <vvil99$1ugd5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvinvp$1vglb$1@dont-email.me> <vviv75$222r6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvj1fp$22a62$1@dont-email.me> <vvj2j6$23gk7$1@dont-email.me>
 <as9TP.251456$lZjd.93653@fx05.ams4> <87msbmeo3b.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjcge$27753$2@dont-email.me> <vvjeqf$28555$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvjffg$28g5i$1@dont-email.me> <875xiaejzg.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjgt1$28g5i$5@dont-email.me> <87jz6qczja.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vvjotc$28g5i$12@dont-email.me>
 <vvnh9u$3hd96$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vvno4e$3in62$2@dont-email.me>
 <5b14da4260c0b7e3235ce05f752c092fade4d70e.camel@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 17:45:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7be348abb5bc2ec0a70724586a3ca680";
	logging-data="3759298"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19OkNMfYXdZn8c5ZXyd8fHA"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5JjVdqlYDzYEiw3anQ5tNWr54yM=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <5b14da4260c0b7e3235ce05f752c092fade4d70e.camel@gmail.com>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250510-2, 5/10/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3527

On 5/10/2025 10:28 AM, wij wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-05-10 at 09:33 -0500, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/10/2025 7:37 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>> Am 09.05.2025 um 04:22 schrieb olcott:
>>>
>>>> Look at their replies to this post.
>>>> Not a one of them will agree that
>>>>
>>>> void DDD()
>>>> {
>>>>     HHH(DDD);
>>>>     return; // final halt state
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> When 1 or more instructions of DDD are correctly
>>>> simulated by HHH then the correctly simulated DDD cannot
>>>> possibly reach its "return" instruction (final halt state).
>>>>
>>>> They have consistently disagreed with this
>>>> simple point for three years.
>>>
>>> I guess that not even a professor of theoretical computer
>>> science would spend years working on so few lines of code.
>>>
>>
>> I created a whole x86utm operating system.
>> It correctly determines that the halting problem's
>> otherwise "impossible" input is actually non halting.
>>
>> int DD()
>> {
>>     int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>     if (Halt_Status)
>>       HERE: goto HERE;
>>     return Halt_Status;
>> }
>>
>> https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm
>>
> 
> Nope.
>  From I know HHH(DD) decides whether the input DD is "impossible" input or not.
> 

DD has the standard form of the "impossible" input.
HHH merely rejects it as non-halting.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer