| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vvqdas$g9oh$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Is Parallel Programming Hard, And, If So, What Can You Do About It? Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 07:47:53 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 12 Message-ID: <vvqdas$g9oh$1@dont-email.me> References: <vvnds6$3gism$1@dont-email.me> <edb59b7854474033c748f0fd668badaa@www.novabbs.org> <w32UP.481123$C51b.217868@fx17.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 16:47:56 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dc430ac5e0844afc9937c0523f1690f1"; logging-data="534289"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/xWVuQANhk4vV7CIXppUdl" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:w1XZ4EqCm62mdUOorH/ZygdmlyY= In-Reply-To: <w32UP.481123$C51b.217868@fx17.iad> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1567 On 5/11/25 6:59 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote: > mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) writes: >> Summary:: Devices need just as much cache coherence as cores--maybe >> more. > > Does a uart need cache coherence? How about a SPI or MMC controller? > I had wondered about SOCs like the RPi Pico With the narrow memory interfaces, are cores starved for memory bandwidth?