Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vvqflj$gmmk$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input
 to HHH(DD)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 16:27:47 +0100
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 90
Message-ID: <vvqflj$gmmk$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vvjcge$27753$2@dont-email.me>
 <vvjeqf$28555$1@dont-email.me> <vvjffg$28g5i$1@dont-email.me>
 <875xiaejzg.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvjgt1$28g5i$5@dont-email.me>
 <87jz6qczja.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvjotc$28g5i$12@dont-email.me>
 <vvnh9u$3hd96$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vvno4e$3in62$2@dont-email.me> <vvo71c$rlt$1@news.muc.de>
 <PlNTP.270466$lZjd.128570@fx05.ams4> <vvobmm$15td$1@news.muc.de>
 <1vOTP.290843$6Qab.147432@fx07.ams4> <vvpufa$12tn$1@news.muc.de>
 <vvqetf$gldn$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 17:27:47 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="023cae9dc0d2c2b383f3d86e34fa8cd9";
	logging-data="547540"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ixKECaHLHi7pSUG1YCKSS2loRXgCyh2EtHK54TtI1PA=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wLh3Fwis4l4E6Uvm+eTZcpTaJsw=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vvqetf$gldn$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4477

On 11/05/2025 16:14, olcott wrote:
> On 5/11/2025 5:34 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 May 2025 20:07:50 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>
>>>> Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 10 May 2025 18:48:12 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>
>>>>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/10/2025 7:37 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>
>>>>>> [ .... ]
>>
>>>>>>>> I guess that not even a professor of theoretical computer 
>>>>>>>> science
>>>>>>>> would spend years working on so few lines of code.
>>
>>
>>>>>>> I created a whole x86utm operating system.
>>>>>>> It correctly determines that the halting problem's otherwise
>>>>>>> "impossible" input is actually non halting.
>>
>>>>>> You've spent over 20 years on this matter.  Compare this 
>>>>>> with Alan
>>>>>> Turing's solution of the Entscheidungsproblem.  He 
>>>>>> published this in
>>>>>> 1936 when he was just 24 years old.
>>
>>>>> Turing didn't solve anything: what he published contained a 
>>>>> mistake:
>>>>> the category (type) error that I have described previously 
>>>>> in this
>>>>> forum.
>>
>>>> What arrogant self-important ignorance!  Turing indeed solved 
>>>> the
>>>> Entscheidungsproblem.  His procedure has been verified by 
>>>> hundreds of
>>>> thousands of mathematicians over the last century, and none 
>>>> of them have
>>>> found flaws in it.
>>
>>> Not at all: I have simply found a flaw that has been 
>>> overlooked all this
>>> time.  Peter effectively found the same flaw but came at it 
>>> from a
>>> different angle.
>>
>> That's laughable.  You're just a confused and deluded 
>> narcissistic crank.
>> If you really believe you've found a flaw in Turing's paper, 
>> try writing
>> it up properly (something which is beyond you) and submit it for
>> publication to a reputable peer-reviewed mathematical journal.  
>> I'd be
>> surprised if you even got a reply.
>>
>>>> It is overwhelmingly likely that your lack of mathematical 
>>>> training has
>>>> led you to delude yourself about finding an error.  The same 
>>>> applies to
>>>> Peter Olcott.
>>
>>> Nope, I have formally defined the error that doesn't 
>>> contradict Peter's
>>> work.
>>
>> You don't even understand what "formally" means.
>>
>>> /Flibble
>>
> 
> You pay attention to irrelevant details.

Perhaps. But you fail to pay attention to relevant details, such 
as the rules of the language you're using.

But details are /so/ tedious, aren't they?

> Flibble does understand the key essence of these
> things better than you.

I have seen no evidence of that.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within