Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vvqflj$gmmk$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD) Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 16:27:47 +0100 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 90 Message-ID: <vvqflj$gmmk$3@dont-email.me> References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me> <vvjcge$27753$2@dont-email.me> <vvjeqf$28555$1@dont-email.me> <vvjffg$28g5i$1@dont-email.me> <875xiaejzg.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvjgt1$28g5i$5@dont-email.me> <87jz6qczja.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvjotc$28g5i$12@dont-email.me> <vvnh9u$3hd96$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vvno4e$3in62$2@dont-email.me> <vvo71c$rlt$1@news.muc.de> <PlNTP.270466$lZjd.128570@fx05.ams4> <vvobmm$15td$1@news.muc.de> <1vOTP.290843$6Qab.147432@fx07.ams4> <vvpufa$12tn$1@news.muc.de> <vvqetf$gldn$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 17:27:47 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="023cae9dc0d2c2b383f3d86e34fa8cd9"; logging-data="547540"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ixKECaHLHi7pSUG1YCKSS2loRXgCyh2EtHK54TtI1PA==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:wLh3Fwis4l4E6Uvm+eTZcpTaJsw= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <vvqetf$gldn$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 4477 On 11/05/2025 16:14, olcott wrote: > On 5/11/2025 5:34 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >> Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> wrote: >>> On Sat, 10 May 2025 20:07:50 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >> >>>> Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 10 May 2025 18:48:12 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >> >>>>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/10/2025 7:37 AM, Bonita Montero wrote: >> >>>>>> [ .... ] >> >>>>>>>> I guess that not even a professor of theoretical computer >>>>>>>> science >>>>>>>> would spend years working on so few lines of code. >> >> >>>>>>> I created a whole x86utm operating system. >>>>>>> It correctly determines that the halting problem's otherwise >>>>>>> "impossible" input is actually non halting. >> >>>>>> You've spent over 20 years on this matter. Compare this >>>>>> with Alan >>>>>> Turing's solution of the Entscheidungsproblem. He >>>>>> published this in >>>>>> 1936 when he was just 24 years old. >> >>>>> Turing didn't solve anything: what he published contained a >>>>> mistake: >>>>> the category (type) error that I have described previously >>>>> in this >>>>> forum. >> >>>> What arrogant self-important ignorance! Turing indeed solved >>>> the >>>> Entscheidungsproblem. His procedure has been verified by >>>> hundreds of >>>> thousands of mathematicians over the last century, and none >>>> of them have >>>> found flaws in it. >> >>> Not at all: I have simply found a flaw that has been >>> overlooked all this >>> time. Peter effectively found the same flaw but came at it >>> from a >>> different angle. >> >> That's laughable. You're just a confused and deluded >> narcissistic crank. >> If you really believe you've found a flaw in Turing's paper, >> try writing >> it up properly (something which is beyond you) and submit it for >> publication to a reputable peer-reviewed mathematical journal. >> I'd be >> surprised if you even got a reply. >> >>>> It is overwhelmingly likely that your lack of mathematical >>>> training has >>>> led you to delude yourself about finding an error. The same >>>> applies to >>>> Peter Olcott. >> >>> Nope, I have formally defined the error that doesn't >>> contradict Peter's >>> work. >> >> You don't even understand what "formally" means. >> >>> /Flibble >> > > You pay attention to irrelevant details. Perhaps. But you fail to pay attention to relevant details, such as the rules of the language you're using. But details are /so/ tedious, aren't they? > Flibble does understand the key essence of these > things better than you. I have seen no evidence of that. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within