Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vvrl9h$o2ab$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Flibble=E2=80=99s_Leap=3A_Why_Behavioral_Divergence?= =?UTF-8?Q?_Implies_a_Type_Distinction_in_the_Halting_Problem?= Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 21:09:53 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 55 Message-ID: <vvrl9h$o2ab$6@dont-email.me> References: <vv1UP.77894$JJT6.54808@fx16.ams4> <vvqd4u$g8a1$1@dont-email.me> <7N2UP.527443$wBt6.464256@fx15.ams4> <vvqfgq$gmmk$1@dont-email.me> <os3UP.670056$BFJ.223954@fx13.ams4> <vvqgpt$gmmk$4@dont-email.me> <aG3UP.366972$wBVe.321504@fx06.ams4> <39947848bf73be52ee6fbbeb6d0d929009dfec8e@i2pn2.org> <fR8UP.92502$o31.50010@fx04.ams4> <fb3915123ad5c4703b92df902c37267fce2c4812@i2pn2.org> <vvrhk6$nejb$2@dont-email.me> <vvrhtj$nnmf$1@dont-email.me> <43f0f4158610d859516ba3e0115a8a2b8bd7630b@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 04:09:54 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="15cac720ddbb61c7f6586fe023932af8"; logging-data="788811"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19c7duuwyvXbKLSdTug6UTp" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:rZdKcu4uwqiBNTdoAosN7YwzCcQ= In-Reply-To: <43f0f4158610d859516ba3e0115a8a2b8bd7630b@i2pn2.org> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250511-4, 5/11/2025), Outbound message Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3454 On 5/11/2025 8:37 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 5/11/25 9:12 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 5/11/2025 8:07 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>> On 12/05/2025 00:19, Richard Damon wrote: >>>> On 5/11/25 5:42 PM, Mr Flibble wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>>> I am happy with my final solution; I glanced over all your >>>>> responses in this thread and they are all invalid. >>>> >>>> >>>> In other words, you are admtting to being happy to be in error. >>> >>> He has form for placing a finger in each ear and yelling "I'm right >>> I'm right I'm right you're all wrong!" >>> >>> There's no talking to 2-year-olds. >>> >> >> No one here is using any actual reasoning >> in their rebuttals of my work. They rely >> on dogma, misdirection, deflection and the >> strawman error. >> >> The last three methods are dishonest. >> > > No, they are responding with rules and definitions from the system in > question, > A syntax error reporting by one compiler and considered irrelevant by another compiler provides zero evidence that DDD correctly emulated by some HHH halts. _DDD() [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD) [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 [00002182] 5d pop ebp [00002183] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] THE ONLY THING THAT SHOWS THIS IS THE IS THE COMPLETE SEQUENCE OF EMULATED STEPS WHERE DDD HALTS. Because you don't give a rat's ass for the actual truth you ignore the actual rebuttal requirements. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer