Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Flibble=E2=80=99s_Leap=3A_Why_Behavioral_Divergence?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?_Implies_a_Type_Distinction_in_the_Halting_Problem?=
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 10:48:43 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <vvt58r$14pca$10@dont-email.me>
References: <vv1UP.77894$JJT6.54808@fx16.ams4> <vvqd4u$g8a1$1@dont-email.me>
 <7N2UP.527443$wBt6.464256@fx15.ams4> <vvqfgq$gmmk$1@dont-email.me>
 <os3UP.670056$BFJ.223954@fx13.ams4> <vvqgpt$gmmk$4@dont-email.me>
 <aG3UP.366972$wBVe.321504@fx06.ams4>
 <39947848bf73be52ee6fbbeb6d0d929009dfec8e@i2pn2.org>
 <fR8UP.92502$o31.50010@fx04.ams4>
 <fb3915123ad5c4703b92df902c37267fce2c4812@i2pn2.org>
 <vvrhk6$nejb$2@dont-email.me> <vvrhtj$nnmf$1@dont-email.me>
 <43f0f4158610d859516ba3e0115a8a2b8bd7630b@i2pn2.org>
 <vvrl9h$o2ab$6@dont-email.me>
 <0f61ca2a124d35f813b117bcf078278ccf719d46@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 17:48:44 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="15cac720ddbb61c7f6586fe023932af8";
	logging-data="1205642"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Ek223xzBfOJWpw1RXZ3FW"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:E3qQr1Rh9Gjc5Dq/s2Obocb36wA=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <0f61ca2a124d35f813b117bcf078278ccf719d46@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250512-2, 5/12/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean

On 5/12/2025 6:51 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/11/25 10:09 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/11/2025 8:37 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 5/11/25 9:12 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 5/11/2025 8:07 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>>> On 12/05/2025 00:19, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/11/25 5:42 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am happy with my final solution; I glanced over all your
>>>>>>> responses in this thread and they are all invalid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In other words, you are admtting to being happy to be in error.
>>>>>
>>>>> He has form for placing a finger in each ear and yelling "I'm right 
>>>>> I'm right I'm right you're all wrong!"
>>>>>
>>>>> There's no talking to 2-year-olds.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No one here is using any actual reasoning
>>>> in their rebuttals of my work. They rely
>>>> on dogma, misdirection, deflection and the
>>>> strawman error.
>>>>
>>>> The last three methods are dishonest.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, they are responding with rules and definitions from the system in 
>>> question,
>>>
>>
>> A syntax error reporting by one compiler and considered
>> irrelevant by another compiler provides zero evidence
>> that DDD correctly emulated by some HHH halts.
> 
> I wasn't talking about "Syntax Errors".
> 
> I was talking about the rules of the field of Computation Theory.
> 
>>
>> _DDD()
>> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>> [00002173] 8bec       mov  ebp,esp  ; housekeeping
>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>> [0000217f] 83c404     add  esp,+04
>> [00002182] 5d         pop  ebp
>> [00002183] c3         ret
>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>
>> THE ONLY THING THAT SHOWS THIS IS THE IS THE
>> COMPLETE SEQUENCE OF EMULATED STEPS WHERE DDD HALTS.
> 
> Which is impossble to do as the above is *NOT* a program, as it fails to 
> have all the code that it uses.

It need not be a program knucklehead.
Termination analyzers often work on C functions.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer