Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: What it would take...
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 04:37:22 +0100
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <vvuepi$1hi3q$5@dont-email.me>
References: <vvm948$34h6g$2@dont-email.me> <87v7q5n3sc.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <vvtf7n$17c1i$5@dont-email.me> <87plgdmldp.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <vvudut$1ife1$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 05:37:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6985d97c0ee12080e7b93a3aa7ef3914";
	logging-data="1624186"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9OKXQII4RLdCbCZhk3MigpQ1Gg90CfF6rJ0+k15wFXw=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:w6ZTcknRpX/AMoZaVGBgqeo0TMI=
In-Reply-To: <vvudut$1ife1$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB

On 13/05/2025 04:23, Mike Terry wrote:
> Mind you it does seem to have gone mad the last month or so.  It 
> seems there are only about 2 or 3 actual variations of what PO is 
> saying and all the rest is several thousand repeats by both PO 
> and responders...

But /now and again/ they get interesting. It's always a pleasure 
to stumble across lucid articles by obvious experts, especially 
when they have the patient courtesy to explain the bits that I so 
obviously don't quite grok.

Special mentions in dispatches go to your good self and to Ben, 
both of whom have shown me far more patience than I had any right 
to expect. You are both a credit to Usenet.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within