Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vvvbtd$1ov7e$10@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: What it would take... Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 13:54:21 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <vvvbtd$1ov7e$10@dont-email.me> References: <vvm948$34h6g$2@dont-email.me> <87v7q5n3sc.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vvtf7n$17c1i$5@dont-email.me> <87plgdmldp.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vvudut$1ife1$1@dont-email.me> <vvuii0$1j0qo$1@dont-email.me> <vvuk0d$1j6s0$5@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 13:54:22 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0f93063a85412bb9b83b70aeb6dff6a7"; logging-data="1866990"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/vjGwH9V3AmS47iZ9TJW9f" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:VzXgWulilQNExsseKgZgkwcs3TM= In-Reply-To: <vvuk0d$1j6s0$5@dont-email.me> Content-Language: nl, en-GB Bytes: 2455 Op 13.mei.2025 om 07:06 schreef olcott: > On 5/12/2025 11:41 PM, André G. Isaak wrote: >> On 2025-05-12 21:23, Mike Terry wrote: >> >>> Mind you it does seem to have gone mad the last month or so. It >>> seems there are only about 2 or 3 actual variations of what PO is >>> saying and all the rest is several thousand repeats by both PO and >>> responders... >> >> Those who insist on responding to Olcott (of which I admit I have >> occasionally been one despite my better intuitions) would be well >> advised to adopt something like the rule of ko (in the game go) which >> prohibits one from returning to the exact same position. Simply >> repeating the same objection after olcott has ignored it is pointless. >> If he didn't get the objection the fiftieth time he's not going to get >> it the fifty-first time either. >> >> If people adopted this policy most of the threads on this forum would >> be considerably shorter. >> >> André >> > > If people would actually address rather than > dishonestly dodge the key points that I making > they would see that I am correct. If olcott would only stop ignoring everything that disturbs his dreams, he would see that his key points have been addresses and refuted many times already.