Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vvvbtd$1ov7e$10@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: What it would take...
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 13:54:21 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <vvvbtd$1ov7e$10@dont-email.me>
References: <vvm948$34h6g$2@dont-email.me> <87v7q5n3sc.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <vvtf7n$17c1i$5@dont-email.me> <87plgdmldp.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <vvudut$1ife1$1@dont-email.me> <vvuii0$1j0qo$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvuk0d$1j6s0$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 13:54:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0f93063a85412bb9b83b70aeb6dff6a7";
	logging-data="1866990"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/vjGwH9V3AmS47iZ9TJW9f"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VzXgWulilQNExsseKgZgkwcs3TM=
In-Reply-To: <vvuk0d$1j6s0$5@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: nl, en-GB
Bytes: 2455

Op 13.mei.2025 om 07:06 schreef olcott:
> On 5/12/2025 11:41 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
>> On 2025-05-12 21:23, Mike Terry wrote:
>>
>>> Mind you it does seem to have gone mad the last month or so.  It 
>>> seems there are only about 2 or 3 actual variations of what PO is 
>>> saying and all the rest is several thousand repeats by both PO and 
>>> responders...
>>
>> Those who insist on responding to Olcott (of which I admit I have 
>> occasionally been one despite my better intuitions) would be well 
>> advised to adopt something like the rule of ko (in the game go) which 
>> prohibits one from returning to the exact same position. Simply 
>> repeating the same objection after olcott has ignored it is pointless. 
>> If he didn't get the objection the fiftieth time he's not going to get 
>> it the fifty-first time either.
>>
>> If people adopted this policy most of the threads on this forum would 
>> be considerably shorter.
>>
>> André
>>
> 
> If people would actually address rather than
> dishonestly dodge the key points that I making
> they would see that I am correct.

If olcott would only stop ignoring everything that disturbs his dreams, 
he would see that his key points have been addresses and refuted many 
times already.