Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning
 instead of rhetoric
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 11:01:36 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <vvvqd1$1tgam$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vvm948$34h6g$2@dont-email.me> <87v7q5n3sc.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <vvtf7n$17c1i$5@dont-email.me> <87plgdmldp.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <vvudut$1ife1$1@dont-email.me> <vvuii0$1j0qo$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvuk0d$1j6s0$5@dont-email.me> <vvvbtd$1ov7e$10@dont-email.me>
 <vvvpia$1tcfq$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 18:01:37 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="43745e07502355f27fac5eed8a7d2487";
	logging-data="2015574"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18d8xMfEkMhvAoO85oZXmrM"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6OPYQC8HLcHUN89TH7t+MwHy8EM=
In-Reply-To: <vvvpia$1tcfq$1@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250513-2, 5/13/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 3432

On 5/13/2025 10:47 AM, Mike Terry wrote:
> On 13/05/2025 12:54, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 13.mei.2025 om 07:06 schreef olcott:
>>> On 5/12/2025 11:41 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
>>>> On 2025-05-12 21:23, Mike Terry wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mind you it does seem to have gone mad the last month or so.  It 
>>>>> seems there are only about 2 or 3 actual variations of what PO is 
>>>>> saying and all the rest is several thousand repeats by both PO and 
>>>>> responders...
>>>>
>>>> Those who insist on responding to Olcott (of which I admit I have 
>>>> occasionally been one despite my better intuitions) would be well 
>>>> advised to adopt something like the rule of ko (in the game go) 
>>>> which prohibits one from returning to the exact same position. 
>>>> Simply repeating the same objection after olcott has ignored it is 
>>>> pointless. If he didn't get the objection the fiftieth time he's not 
>>>> going to get it the fifty-first time either.
>>>>
>>>> If people adopted this policy most of the threads on this forum 
>>>> would be considerably shorter.
>>>>
>>>> André
>>>>
>>>
>>> If people would actually address rather than
>>> dishonestly dodge the key points that I making
>>> they would see that I am correct.
>>
>> If olcott would only stop ignoring everything that disturbs his 
>> dreams, he would see that his key points have been addresses and 
>> refuted many times already.
> 
> We might call that a disturbing ko.
> 
> Mike.

The actual reasoning why HHH is supposed to report
on the behavior of the direct execution of DD()
instead of the actual behavior that the finite
string of DD specifies:

*DD emulated by HHH according to*
*the rules of the x86 language*

has never been explained. The closest thing to
reasoning that was provided on this point is
"that is what textbooks say".

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer