Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <w0fF3cTi6yGH5F-pDMYGxAkwnUQ@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Space and spacetime
References: <v4i6s0$31ct8$1@dont-email.me> <v4k05l$3agjr$3@paganini.bofh.team> <IZqLWu0r1pGumkx88v-OnXgTbLY@jntp>
 <v4k663$3ffi9$4@dont-email.me> <17d93348537e1796$6108$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <v4k80f$3ffi9$5@dont-email.me>
 <lCsBFJy6DdfgQRzDzm_NLNIEi-o@jntp> <v4l1da$3kq2l$2@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: C2mKbJ-Da08pCJemmIaEXtL3V4w
JNTP-ThreadID: v4i6s0$31ct8$1@dont-email.me
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=w0fF3cTi6yGH5F-pDMYGxAkwnUQ@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 24 21:57:11 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-06-15T21:57:11Z/8903701"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 3064
Lines: 46

Le 15/06/2024 à 23:34, Python a écrit :
>> Laisse Maciej tranquille.
> 
> Why? By the way what's your opinion about his argument on
> the definition of a second back in Einstein's times and now?
> 
>> Il se trompe certes sur le fait que t'=t.
> 
> Neither you or him could even explain what it would mean
> anyway.
> 
>> Mais il est moins bouffon que toi.
>> 
>> T'euh qu'un guignol!
>> 
>> T'euh même pas capab' de comprendre des évidence telles que 
>> Vapp=v/(1+cosµ.v/c)
> 
> There is nothing obvious there.
> The very formula I have derived and you never did? :-D
> 
>> Même Maciej il le comprend...
> 
> I doubt it. Ask him.

Yes, but at this price, something strange is evident.

You keep repeating: "Hachel is a joke, you should definitely not think 
that he is not a big dick in the whole history of humanity, he is not a 
three-time Nobel Prize winner, he knows nothing in sociology, nothing in 
medicine, nothing in theology, nothing in relativistic physics, etc...."

Then you say: “he is capable of nothing”.

Then you take an equation and say:
Vapp=v/(1+cosµ.v/c) it's good, I checked it, but it's not his.
Because if it was him, it would be fake.

This all turns grotesque.

Okay, will you try your page on apparent speeds? There is Paul B. Andersen 
who attempted one which I skimmed from afar (because I cannot read English 
quickly), I do not see why by repeating what he says, what I say, and what 
you said on the subject,
you couldn't make a two or three page pdf.

R.H.