Path: ...!news.nobody.at!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <w19rV2lulodsexk_EJwR8Y6actc@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,
References: <dad338831baa98f3eb1ca50452fd9401@www.novabbs.com> <-tG8Hi03qne7eCcgi1yM30wkd7Y@jntp>
 <04268b2ca87c0af810c72499ac5e736f@www.novabbs.com> <ZA_Ip55J4Us1loB0OkP2EJm1WRU@jntp>
 <9555d4a308c249eeef996b2957902fc7@www.novabbs.com> <vc7ehc$2bg7g$1@dont-email.me>
 <3d19aab5cf2bc8c14868ced3d0dda88c@www.novabbs.com> <02841f8e2b10ab216f462f52165399c1@www.novabbs.com>
 <d2fe4505066151ec83cc8e06b8def6f4@www.novabbs.com> <XbC5Qu49_RUWjjFOyZdz8vEqTRo@jntp>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: sdMDyADt0SloYMsJ1DCE7W2isCs
JNTP-ThreadID: dad338831baa98f3eb1ca50452fd9401@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@nemoweb.net
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=w19rV2lulodsexk_EJwR8Y6actc@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 24 19:58:35 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="88d8e3fc77776d6bcc186faa1aefc7625bd3eae9"; logging-data="2024-09-17T19:58:35Z/9026097"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <python@not-formail.invalid>
Bytes: 3404
Lines: 38

Le 17/09/2024 à 21:32, Richard Hachel  a écrit :
> Le 17/09/2024 à 20:23, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit :
>> Mr. Hertz: Only a complete fool would consider it credible at all.
>> Radwan M. Kassir is an excellent critic of relativist math in his book,
>> "Mathematical Conflicts in the Special Theory of Relativity," Third
>> Edition.
> 
> If we push the mathematics of SR a little, and not much, we realize that it does 
> not hold up for a single instant, and that we find ourselves in terrible 
> absurdities.
> 
> But the most dramatic thing is not there, I have always said it: the most 
> dramatic thing is the fanatical belief in lousy mathematical concepts.
> 
> I am always surprised that no mathematician has ever shattered this true theory, 
> but explained by crazy physicists.
> 
> What is crazier than physicists who, telling us, that there is a contraction of 
> distances, that is to say that in Stella's frame of reference (Langevin) the 
> distance traveled on Stella's return is not 12 ly, but 7.2 ly.
> 
> Except that her proper time is 9 years. Which they admit.
> 
> Except that it is fixed in its frame of reference, and that it observes the 
> earth approaching it with an apparent speed of 4c.
> 
> Except that the fact of observing for 9 years a body moving with an apparent 
> speed of a speed of 4c, has never made that x = Vapp.tau = 7.2 al.
> 
> What to answer to Doctor Hachel? Nothing.


https://gitlab.com/python_431/cranks-and-physics/-/blob/main/Hachel/divagation_lengrand.pdf

<http://nemoweb.net/jntp?w19rV2lulodsexk_EJwR8Y6actc@jntp/Data.Media:1>

This is definitely not "nothing" :-)