Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<wPGdnZ2Gj7r7rnH6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:41:42 +0000
Subject: Re: Muon paradox
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com>
 <69a411f78f0258b39bc5cfad5d0a82a2@www.novabbs.com>
 <5eeed9d7dcd249453d28b665513d9ede@www.novabbs.com>
 <dfZOTD7gWFQtbW5-AX25hmrFeIQ@jntp> <vsgfhf$2qcig$1@dont-email.me>
 <ce054dc78a263158bb6787569d255311@www.novabbs.com>
 <vsharm$3mltr$2@dont-email.me>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 11:41:39 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vsharm$3mltr$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <wPGdnZ2Gj7r7rnH6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 27
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-Rl42xKq4Knakvs6wl4QroLi6uTOuD1Shwr+bkMQPq6itk4ZzZJUCammYeXd0toGuB0ed1oLqx6usUkB!+B5KoLPz1y6Rf809rDEVFQW0X5NU1IXVapd7aX5frZ8FcCqM5N0NEmB6DIad2/46NMAC1exUjYs=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2591

On 04/01/2025 11:26 AM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
> Den 01.04.2025 17:38, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>
>> I mean, "Yes, muons have mass, and their mass is approximately 207 times
>> that of an electron, with a value of about 105.7 MeV/c², according to
>> Britannica [10, 17] and other sources [1, 3, 6, 7]." -Google AI
>> So they must move faster in the atmosphere.
>
> So since the mass of a  muon is 207 times the mass of an electron
> it must fall 207 times faster than an electron? :-D
>


The inverse of frequency and wavelength with regards to waves or
the particles moving along as those are and calling that all
"electromagnetic radiation" is one of the great conflations
since the kinetic and nuclear and electromagnetic radiation
in both the long and short waves and the special optical light
and the three constants "c" about the light's and the electromagnetic
and electrostatics', and about waves whether it's velocity,
help illustrate that according to that kind of conflation,
muons don't so much belong to SR, nor make much sense from
the conflated and ignorant SR-ianism.

Not so much that's their fault, as, doesn't belong to them.