Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 22:28:45 +0000
Subject: Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <84deac76f160f1f681f5275e10d7e683@www.novabbs.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 14:28:45 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <84deac76f160f1f681f5275e10d7e683@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <wZqcnbZJrLmAZvz6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 92
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-C4Euy9Kl7iYT+JMeJ2BQn0A6Xa/Aim/0dYCxf2eeRAdY9JsfpZfgX9Kx3s3MLKPJHHFWL2glig8cN9e!eERh54ac4pXhGvbljCd/Vb+dOKrBQohJx9xRonKvyvpQdpbociINyRLj2XK8yRlGQM0RBf/Br9U=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 5067

On 12/17/2024 11:50 AM, rhertz wrote:
> EXCERPTS FROM EINSTEIN'S 1911 PAPER:  On the Influence of Gravitation on
> the Propagation of Light
>
> ***********************************************************************
> 2. On the Gravitation of Energy
> ........................................
> We consider the process of transmission of energy by radiation from S2
> to S1 from a system K0, which is free of acceleration.
> ..................
> Therefore by the ordinary theory of relativity the radiation arriving at
> S1 does not possess the energy E2, but a greater energy E1, which is
> related to E2; to a rst approximation, by the equation:
>
> (1)                  E1 = E2 (1 + gh/c²)
>
> By our assumption exactly the same relation holds if the same process
> takes place in the system K, which is not accelerated, but is provided
> with a gravitational field.
>
> In this case we may replace  by the potential gh of the gravitation
> vector in S2, if the arbitrary constant of ɸ  in S1 is set to zero. We
> then have the equation:
>
> (1a)                  E1 = E2 + E2 ɸ/c²
>
> This equation expresses the energy law for the process under
> observation. The energy E1 arriving at S1 is greater than the energy E2,
> measured by the same means, which was emitted from S2, the excess being
> the potential energy of the mass E2/c² in the gravitational field. This
> shows that in order to satisfy the energy principle we have to ascribe
> to the energy E, before its emission from S2, a potential energy, due to
> gravity, which corresponds to the (GRAVITATIONAL) MASS E/c².
> .....................................
> 3. Time and the Velocity of Light in the Gravitational Field
>
> If the radiation emitted in the uniformly accelerated system K0 in S2
> toward S1 had the frequency f2 relative to the clock at S2, then,
> relative to S1, at its arrival at S1 it no longer has the frequency f2
> relative to an identical clock at S1, but a greater frequency f1, such
> that, to a first approximation
>
> (2)                  f1 = f2 (1 + gh/c²)
>
> ******************************************************************************
>
>
>
> Since 1911, and for more than 100 years, Eq (2) has remained under the
> form  Δf/f₀ = gh/c² or equivalent, before or after the 1917
> Schwarzschild-Hilbert solution in GR.
>
> 1911, Einstein:   Δf/f₀ = gh/c²   (light has mass E/c², asserted
> Einstein)
>
> 1959, Pound-Rebka: Δf/f₀ = gh/c²   (Is Einstein right with light having
> mass?)
>
> 1971, Hafele-Keating:  Δτ/τ₀ = gh/c² (Is Einstein right with GR time
> dilation?)
>
> 2015, Mudrak et. all:  Δf/f₀ = GMₑ/c² [(a - r)/(ar) + J₂/2] ≈ gh/c²  (if
> a ≈ r)
>
>
>
>
>
> ALL OF THE AB0VE CRAP IS FALSE, AND CAN BE TRACED BACK TO THE 1907-1911
> PERIOD, WHEN THE RETARDED TRIED TO INCORPORATE GRAVITY TO SR.
>
> BY 1915-1917, THE SCHWARZSCHILS-HILBERT PARTICULAR SOLUTION EMERGED,
> WITH A VERY SPECIFIC CONTEXT FOR APPLICABILITY. IN PARTICULAR, THE SUN
> WAS MODELED AS A
> NON-ROTATING POINT-LIKE MASS, WITH MERCURY AS A MASSLESS TEST PARTICLE.
>
> YET, RELATIVISTIC MORONS INSIST ON APPLYING IT TO EVERYTHING ABOVE THE
> EARTH'S SURFACE. EITHER MOVING OR STATIC. BECAUSE THEY ARE IMMORAL
> SOLD-OUTS, THAT SAW A COW TO BE MILKED TO ITS DEATH, WHILE THEY'RE
> PROFITING IN MANY WAYS.
>
> THE PSEUDO-SCIENCE OF RELATIVISM IS USED BY PARASITES TO HAVE A NICE AND
> UNACCOUNTABLE WAY OF LIVING. THEY ALSO RELY ON AMATEURS FOLLOWERS OF THE
> CULT, TO SPREAD THEIR SHIT, TRUSTING IN THEIR BORN IMBECILITY AS
> GULLIBLE CRETINS.

Actually space-contraction after motion was arrived
at long before that, where what you're looking at
is ten different things mashed into a muddy wad,
and what you're looking at is what _you're_ seeing.