Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <wl2vhYpdP6hxCXMK3eWuC3zr5GU@jntp>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<wl2vhYpdP6hxCXMK3eWuC3zr5GU@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <wl2vhYpdP6hxCXMK3eWuC3zr5GU@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
References: <693b1f71c994c268d60983eb81fc6aaa@www.novabbs.com> <hRycnWu7NvCFvub7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <667bc249$0$11713$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <fLmcnSyR2vOM7OH7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <6686f816$0$3283$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <v68col$3fag8$1@paganini.bofh.team>
 <2b08dc378555ea532b8bb69fb2f3b360@www.novabbs.com> <les1i7F7uhdU3@mid.individual.net> <vTeKYe70G9a4iuA4ZuS-FqbH7LI@jntp>
 <lev1c8Fl85bU5@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: VLfKjt5bITj0fSBRB_OhkNaK7ps
JNTP-ThreadID: 693b1f71c994c268d60983eb81fc6aaa@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=wl2vhYpdP6hxCXMK3eWuC3zr5GU@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 24 11:51:01 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-07T11:51:01Z/8936779"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 4144
Lines: 64

Le 07/07/2024 à 10:19, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 13:41 schrieb Richard Hachel:
>> Le 06/07/2024 à 07:04, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>> Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 02:15 schrieb bertietaylor:
>>>> Conservation of charge is the only conservation law.
>>>> Rest is bollocks.
>>>
>>>
>>> I would say: no, charge is not 'observer invariant'.
>>>
>>> Actually  I try to promote a concept, where the electron and a photon 
>>> are the same thing, where the electron is circeling around in an atom, 
>>> while the photon flies away in a streight line.
>>>
>>> The 'photoelectric effect' is then easy:
>>>
>>> in this concept a photon is kind of helical srew (wave packet).
>>>
>>> If that is stopped (e.g. by a metall screen) then the helical screw is 
>>> 'knocked flat' and circles around a point, hence is an electron.
>>>
>>> A electron is actually not a real separate entity, but a certain 
>>> aspect of a standing 'rotation wave'.
>>>
>>> The outer edge is called 'electron' and the inner turning point 'proton'.
>>>
>>> If the electron 'rolls away', it will become a photon.
>>>
>>> And if the photon gets stopped, it will become an electron.
>>>
>>> Therefore: charge is not conserved.
>>>
>>>
>>> TH
>> 
>> C'est intéressant.
>> 
>> Sauf que j'ai toujours dit que "the photon doesn't exist".
>> 
> Sorry, but I understand only very little French ( a little but, but not 
> much).
> 
> So, please, say it again, but in English.
> 
> (german would be ok, too, but I guess you don't speak that).
> 
> 
> 
> TH

Ich sagte, Sir, dass das Photon keine Existenzmöglichkeit habe. Es 
handelt sich lediglich um ein augenblicklich übertragenes Energiequantum 
(im Bezugssystem des Empfängers, aber nicht im Bezugssystem der Quelle, 
selbst wenn diese komobil und stationär sind).
Das habe ich gesagt.
Aufgrund einer Eigenschaft des Raums, die Doktor Richard Hachel 
universelle Anisochronie nennt, nimmt das „Photon“ je nach 
Betrachtungsweise die Erscheinung einer Welle oder eines Teilchens an.
Ich glaube auch, dass ein guter Physiker gerade einen Artikel über die 
Idee geschrieben hat, dass das Photon nicht existiert.
Wenn das wahr ist, stimme ich zu und unterstütze, was er sagt.
„Das Photon existiert nicht: Zwischen hier und dort gibt es nichts.“
Zwischen der Quelle und dem Empfänger.

R.H.