Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<x2KL2Tb5_4Bhoqnp4PGINDLCTRg@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <x2KL2Tb5_4Bhoqnp4PGINDLCTRg@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: how References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp> <LZ3KdDUp5cpe_rTVoGxVyiFF21g@jntp> <v4i294$30hok$2@dont-email.me> <v4idib$32cg3$2@dont-email.me> <pk_Qk0g8Nk2CqK9Y4UFz2c_PgfM@jntp> <v4nd23$6bcp$1@dont-email.me> <v4nf4k$6dmg$1@dont-email.me> <v4nfoo$6dmg$2@dont-email.me> <v4nqag$8qsv$1@dont-email.me> <e6e9f8a6-b9ce-4154-916a-0b3af224c413@att.net> Newsgroups: sci.math JNTP-HashClient: w06-nZrnOwj0Bz7obfIk0QPi5OE JNTP-ThreadID: 4YLc1knY-8u5i_KQ0oWqy89D7aY JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=x2KL2Tb5_4Bhoqnp4PGINDLCTRg@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Tue, 18 Jun 24 20:13:12 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="25d5a506365fc8262443ce1bd287e5d0233c1bef"; logging-data="2024-06-18T20:13:12Z/8907971"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Bytes: 2185 Lines: 30 Le 18/06/2024 à 02:04, Jim Burns a écrit : >> So _different_ unit fractions >> CAN'T BE "at the same coordinate" >> (i.e. equal to the same real number). > > Yes. > However, WM gives 'fraction' and 'rational' > different meanings. > 1/2 2/4 3/6 4/8 ... > are all different _fractions_ corresponding to > the same _rational_ at the same point. But unit fractions are unique as real numbers. > > _As rationals_ > whatever we can say about 1/2 > we can say about 2/4 > Conventionally. By definition. Yes. > > _As fractions_ > in Cantor's sequence, > the index of 1/2 is 2 > the index of 2/4 is 12 > We can say different things. Yes. Regards, WM