Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<xQQT0K_Q_k2FbMcCUXF8j3CEg84@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <xQQT0K_Q_k2FbMcCUXF8j3CEg84@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <881fc1a1-2e55-4f13-8beb-94d1f941b5af@att.net> <vg44QVKbPSR4U0Tq71L-fg5yqgM@jntp> <85194aeb-1b24-4486-8bcc-4dcd43b4fd2f@att.net> <VPcfM2gW_CIIfddmzwBYPrpt87w@jntp> <f3089a55-39f4-4df1-a525-58e21342ced8@att.net> <P04FAosjolyjDfgV0JPXWx1mF6o@jntp> <40165884-df8f-4614-8644-9161d72fd1cb@att.net> <-qUZ96ARwcjh9QPfyWRnijjNwoY@jntp> <6b837540-3d9a-4b8e-9a70-88d52e81a1a4@att.net> Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math JNTP-HashClient: h6rcVDyVf-bazaRBNPOrNX1YrOw JNTP-ThreadID: KFm3f7lT2HjaTSiMfnv5xqZoSBw JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=xQQT0K_Q_k2FbMcCUXF8j3CEg84@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Thu, 01 Aug 24 12:13:39 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="82b75c1d0a83e677ff646b52485f72f8b23749df"; logging-data="2024-08-01T12:13:39Z/8971680"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Bytes: 2512 Lines: 27 Le 31/07/2024 à 19:33, Jim Burns a écrit : > On 7/31/2024 9:59 AM, WM wrote: >> Le 30/07/2024 à 20:37, Jim Burns a écrit : > >>> NUF(x) = |⅟ℕ∩(0,x]| = ℵ₀ >>> does not imply any unit fraction outside (0,x] >> >> But it implies that you can use only >> x having ℵ₀ smaller positive points, >> in fact even ℵ₀*2ℵ₀. >> >> ∀ x > 0: NUF(x) = ℵ₀ would be wrong. > > Each non.{}.subset of ⅟ℕ∩(0,1] is maximummed. > ∀S ⊆ ⅟ℕ∩(0,1]: S ≠ {} ⇒ ∃u = max.S In the dark domain the maximum cannot be discerned. > > Each unit.fraction in ⅟ℕ∩(0,1] is down.stepped. > ∀u ∈ ⅟ℕ∩(0,1] ∃v = ⅟(1+⅟u) = max.⅟ℕ∩(0,u) Assuming all this would lead to potential infinity. I assume actual infinity however. There are dark numbers. There is a greates natnumber. There is no chance to lose Bob. Regards, WM