Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<xn0ojfz3r1355dd00c@news.eternal-september.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: A Real Person reviews Season 22
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 22:19:46 +0000
Organization: Eternal-September
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <xn0ojfz3r1355dd00c@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <ut5tt5$3buk9$1@dont-email.me> <ut6mlo$1ji9$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="618eeb8218009e092b7c6ac32b8cad54";
	logging-data="3962724"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19JMYuPEeX7/QgFxjoG0nBQ"
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IuPxKxqwJNsSFX+iZWFP+iz5OdI=
X-Ref: news.eternal-september.org ~XNS:000004F5
X-Face: "%,CLLw+;\t#ytLlWP0h4~#'EX.l{<Mu;Rc-MNd)+|Ru0:##TaO.;z~6BMqh|4=.6%UVy;E&'Dl}awS.?%!tWj1Fs\-J/)<S[AWij4]qs[K{6H}tC<pGg?D)_gplS[3'y2H2Rf?%CPNMbin}[z[xa96yi4mK{(?&nM%1D,M
Bytes: 2182

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <ut5tt5$3buk9$1@dont-email.me>,
> Agent Jakanov  <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote:
> > This is an actual review written by an actual person, not
> > some fake ChapBot.
> >
> > [Snip]
> > 
> > Overall, despite its flaws, this season felt more consistent
> > in tone than many of the others did in the 1980's.  The
> > strong opening and closing stories, which were both crafted
> > by the same writer, make it comparable to some of the 21st
> > Century Doctor Who series. 
> 
> Timelash was lame! THe rest rocked !

The best stories of Colin Baker's era was within S22 anyway...
IMHO. A great actor doing the best he could with - at times -
shoddy tools.

> Revelation of the Daleks 8/10 !!

A bit over-generous there I think Dave... on a good day I'd give
"Revelation of the Daleks" a 6/10, on a over-critical day a 5/10.

Like all stories from the JNT era if you ignore the flaws the
stories could be enjoyable enough, but if you wanted to nit-pick
then there were plenty of things to find fault with.