Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<xn0ojfz3r1355dd00c@news.eternal-september.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: A Real Person reviews Season 22 Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 22:19:46 +0000 Organization: Eternal-September Lines: 29 Message-ID: <xn0ojfz3r1355dd00c@news.eternal-september.org> References: <ut5tt5$3buk9$1@dont-email.me> <ut6mlo$1ji9$5@gallifrey.nk.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="618eeb8218009e092b7c6ac32b8cad54"; logging-data="3962724"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19JMYuPEeX7/QgFxjoG0nBQ" User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IuPxKxqwJNsSFX+iZWFP+iz5OdI= X-Ref: news.eternal-september.org ~XNS:000004F5 X-Face: "%,CLLw+;\t#ytLlWP0h4~#'EX.l{<Mu;Rc-MNd)+|Ru0:##TaO.;z~6BMqh|4=.6%UVy;E&'Dl}awS.?%!tWj1Fs\-J/)<S[AWij4]qs[K{6H}tC<pGg?D)_gplS[3'y2H2Rf?%CPNMbin}[z[xa96yi4mK{(?&nM%1D,M Bytes: 2182 The Doctor wrote: > In article <ut5tt5$3buk9$1@dont-email.me>, > Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote: > > This is an actual review written by an actual person, not > > some fake ChapBot. > > > > [Snip] > > > > Overall, despite its flaws, this season felt more consistent > > in tone than many of the others did in the 1980's. The > > strong opening and closing stories, which were both crafted > > by the same writer, make it comparable to some of the 21st > > Century Doctor Who series. > > Timelash was lame! THe rest rocked ! The best stories of Colin Baker's era was within S22 anyway... IMHO. A great actor doing the best he could with - at times - shoddy tools. > Revelation of the Daleks 8/10 !! A bit over-generous there I think Dave... on a good day I'd give "Revelation of the Daleks" a 6/10, on a over-critical day a 5/10. Like all stories from the JNT era if you ignore the flaws the stories could be enjoyable enough, but if you wanted to nit-pick then there were plenty of things to find fault with.