Article <xn0ojynw2bbk4tx003@news.giganews.com>

Deutsch English Français Italiano
<xn0ojynw2bbk4tx003@news.giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: "Dexter" <not@home.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: o
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 04:03:35 +0000
Organization: University of Ediacara
Lines: 68
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <xn0ojynw2bbk4tx003@news.giganews.com>
References: <uu6kom$ajd9$1@dont-email.me> <AdXNN.93920$LONb.3185@fx08.iad> <uu9hks$ipvj$5@dont-email.me> <5gYNN.478357$vFZa.473963@fx13.iad> <xn0ojy4mvb2pf75002@news.giganews.com> <6Y3ON.187465$taff.82486@fx41.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="57402"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.20-0cfde51 (x86; Portable ISpell)
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Bytes: 5784

Ron Dean wrote:

> Dexter wrote:
> > Ron Dean wrote:
> > 
> > > vallor wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 12:37:52 -0400, Ron Dean <rondean-noreply@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote in <AdXNN.93920$LONb.3185@fx08.iad>:
> > > > 
> > > > > RonO wrote:
> > > > > > https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/22/west-virginia-
> > > > intelligent-design-religion-teaching/367f8bba-
> > > > e894-11ee-9eba-1558f848ec25_story.html
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The claim is that if a student asks a teacher about some alternative
> > > > > > "theory" the teacher can answer that question, but there is no
> > > > > > recommendation on what an honest and acceptable answer would be
> > > > > > since the "theory" that they want to get into the public schools
> > > > > > isn't a scientific theory, and should probably be labeled as to
> > > > > > what it is in any discussion on the topic.  If the legislators
> > > > > > believe otherwise they should have made that clear in the act, and
> > > > > > they should have been more honest as to what they were doing.
> >>>>  >
> > > > > Considering the Intelligent design argument does not identify a
> > > > > designer? How should this question be answered? A student wanted to
> > > > > know why Intellignet Design is wrong,
> > > > 
> > > > The answer to the question is "mu".
> > > > 
> > > > (The burden of proof is on the ID proponents to present evidence
> > > > that it is "right".)
> > > > 
> > > > Additionally, I see you aren't using a spell checker.  Is that
> > > > a new development, or were you fibbing when you said your spell checker
> > > > "corrected" the name "Osama" to someone else in your bigoted statement,
> > > > hmmm?
> > > > 
> > > My bigotry is directed towards terrorist. I hate terrorist violence. I
> > > question that you love terrorist.  But what other reason for challenging
> > > my view?
> > -------------------------------------
> > 
> > Interesting that you should introduce the topic of terrorism in this thread.
> > If one examines recent christian history, I think it could properly be said
> > that christianity shares some distinct terroristic tendencies with other
> > contemporary religions.
> > 
> In my view, there is absolutely no justification for any terrorism regardless
> of who's the perpetrator or whatever is the cause. I made this clear: so, why
> do you bring this up?
> > 
> > https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1957842/
> >
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/abortviolence/stories/atlanta.htm
> >
https://www.justice.gov/crt/recent-cases-violence-against-reproductive-health-care-providers
> > https://www.britannica.com/biography/Eric-Rudolph
> >
https://prochoice.org/violence-against-abortion-providers-continues-to-rise-following-roe-reversal-new-report-finds/
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence
> > 
-------------------------------------

You're the one who noted your bigotry was towards terror and terrorists. 
Aren't the actions noted in these links those of terrorists who's motives are 
based on their religious beliefs?  It seems I may have found your blind spot.