Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<xn0okhkwjj3w3t007@news.eternal-september.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: Which Decade was the best for Doctor Who? Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:00:39 +0100 Organization: Eternal-September Lines: 22 Message-ID: <xn0okhkwjj3w3t007@news.eternal-september.org> References: <uuu2cr$1qhp$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <1354982695.734545394.097383.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <uv93fl$1pbbb$2@dont-email.me> <nbv6A4B+GEGmFwWc@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk> <uv9jq4$22ht$3@gallifrey.nk.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:00:44 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a414ce885a92df65f6dccf5cdd589195"; logging-data="2526645"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BbgqqDVnWPuLr5LLhxtoe" User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OZhxWvYCp08XexuVSfnlH7XMU6k= X-Face: "%,CLLw+;\t#ytLlWP0h4~#'EX.l{<Mu;Rc-MNd)+|Ru0:##TaO.;z~6BMqh|4=.6%UVy;E&'Dl}awS.?%!tWj1Fs\-J/)<S[AWij4]qs[K{6H}tC<pGg?D)_gplS[3'y2H2Rf?%CPNMbin}[z[xa96yi4mK{(?&nM%1D,M X-Ref: news.eternal-september.org ~XNS:00000607 Bytes: 2180 The Doctor wrote: > In article <nbv6A4B+GEGmFwWc@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>, > John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote: > > In message <uv93fl$1pbbb$2@dont-email.me>, Cryptoengineer > ><petertrei@gmail.com> writes > > > The best Dr. Who decade is the decade in which > > > you first encounter the show. > > > > For me that was the 1960s, but I don't consider that the > > best decade. For me that would have to be the 1970s. And > > though William Hartnell was my first Doctor, I consider Tom > > Baker's Doctor the best. Colin Baker's was the worst - > > through no fault of his own, it was just that the way the > > series chose to develop his character was misguided IMO. > > Many seem to choose the 1970s. They can't all be wrong! I notice very few people choose the late 1980's anyway...