Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<xn0olvztn5vqp6w001@reader443.eternal-september.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: Additions to the iOS/Android Features Document Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 15:32:59 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: <xn0olvztn5vqp6w001@reader443.eternal-september.org> References: <v23itk$15peo$1@dont-email.me> <xn0olvrtb5kv916000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v251kv$2lke$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 17:32:59 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bb6ac3160823d1e7ff12786f3489c682"; logging-data="1732796"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18bmSkbGGl8mGLmDDrTtiT6qKL8sCdPJY8=" User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.372 (x86; Portable ISpell) Cancel-Lock: sha1:s2USyRwjqj8Jxi9H5Dn/atFLfc8= X-Ref: reader443.eternal-september.org ~XNS:00002B90 X-Face: 09>j%-W3HnyolA\I${DXfUw}~nKyLDiU8IwUVM'` Bytes: 2610 Andrew wrote: >badgolferman wrote on Thu, 16 May 2024 10:28:32 -0000 (UTC) : > >> I wonder if nospam has gone missing because he's busy writing 123 >>pages of refutations for your document... > >I've read Steve's document in the past and the reason all the >uneducated ignorant Apple religious zealots hated it was it was >almost all true. > >The only thing is Steve doesn't know Android all that well, but he >uses both daily (as do I) so he reasonably well versed in what iOS >should be able to do (because all operating systems other than iOS >easily do them). > >It's no longer shocking that thousands upon thousands of very simple >things that every other OS easily does - are completely impossible on >iOS - all of which nospam would have said in his ignorant way, as you >very well know... > > "Nobody (using Apple products) needs functionality" > "Nobody (using Apple products) wants functionality" To be fair, nospam would say "it's not needed" or "no one wants it". >nospam's contract to defend Apple to the death apparently wasn't renewed. Considering nospam's Shift keys were broken and he worked overtime to defend Apple, maybe he was asking for more than Apple felt was worth defending their name. -- "My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating." ~ Ashleigh Brilliant